MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4392853676 · doi:10.1136/lupus-2024-el.17

O7 High incidence of both spontaneous and indicated preterm birth in women with systemic lupus erythematosus: a systematic review and meta-analysis

2024· review· en· W4392853676 on OpenAlex
Birgit S. Blomjous, Carolien N. H. Abheiden, Ciska Slaager, Anadeijda J. E. M. C. Landman, Johannes C. F. Ket, Jane E. Salmon, Jill P. Buyon, Martijn W. Heymans, Johanna de Vries, Irene E. M. Bultink, Marjon A. de Boer

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueOral Presentations · 2024
Typereview
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicSystemic Lupus Erythematosus Research
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersAstraZeneca
KeywordsIncidence (geometry)Meta-analysisMedicineSystemic lupusObstetricsInternal medicinePhysicsDiseaseOptics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

<h3>Objective</h3> Preterm birth (PTB) is a frequent complication of pregnancy in women with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE). The high indicated PTB rate due to hypertensive disorders of pregnancy and/or fetal growth restriction in women with SLE is well known. Preventive measures are taken and screening for early detection are performed, but the risk of spontaneous PTB is less well recognized. The objective of this study is to determine the rates of both spontaneous and indicated PTB in pregnancies of women with SLE. <h3>Methods</h3> A systematic literature search using Pubmed, Embase, Web of Science and Google Scholar was performed in June 2021. Studies on pregnant women with SLE reporting spontaneous and indicated PTB (birth &lt;37 weeks) rates were selected. Original research articles in English published from 1995 to June 2021 were included. Quality and risk of bias of the included studies were assessed using the Newcastle-Ottawa Quality Assessment Scale (NOS). To estimate the pooled event rates and 95% confidence intervals, meta-analyses of single proportions with a random-effects model were performed. <h3>Results</h3> We included 21 articles, containing data of 8157 ongoing pregnancies in women with SLE. Fifteen out of the 21 included studies were of good quality according to the NOS. From the ongoing pregnancies, 31% (95% CI [0.26; 0.35]) resulted in PTB, of which 46% (95% CI [0.39; 0.54]) were spontaneous, and 53% (95% CI [0.44; 0.61]) were indicated; in 1% the cause of PTB was unknown. The incidence of spontaneous PTB in all pregnancies was 14% (95% CI [0.11; 0.16]) and of indicated PTB 16% (95% CI [0.12; 0.19]). <h3>Conclusion</h3> In pregnant women with SLE, spontaneous as well as indicated PTB rates are high. This information should be applied in (pre-pregnancy) counselling and management in pregnancy. The knowledge obtained by this review and meta-analysis paves the way for further research of associated risk factors and development of interventions to reduce spontaneous PTB rate in SLE pregnancies. <h3>Funding</h3> None.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Systematic review · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.668
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0110.001
Bibliometrics0.0020.003
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.055
GPT teacher head0.363
Teacher spread0.307 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it