MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4392869623 · doi:10.47776/praxis.v2i3.946

Pengembangan Bisnis Pondok Pesantren Berbasis Sociopreneur Dalam Mewujudkan Semangat Santripreneur

2024· article· id· W4392869623 on OpenAlexaff
Bambang Arianto, Bekti Handayani, Marwati Marwati

Bibliographic record

VenuePRAXIS Jurnal Pengabdian kepada Masyarakat · 2024
Typearticle
Languageid
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicEducation and Character Development
Canadian institutionsEncana (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSociologyBusiness administrationBusiness

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Pengembangan bisnis pondok pesantren dapat memberikan dampak signifikan bagi pengembangan diri para santri dalam berwirausaha. Sejatinya para santri tidak hanya belajar ilmu agama tetapi juga belajar tentang kewirausahaan yang linier dengan semangat santripreneur. Model pengembangan bisnis pondok pesantren yang dikembangkan adalah kewirausahaan sosial (sociopreneur) karena selaras dengan karakter pondok pesantren. Dalam pengabdian masyarakat di pondok pesantren Salafiyah Raudhotutholibin Al-Asy’Ariyah Desa Purwadadi yang dilaksanakan pada tanggal 10 November 2023, telah diberikan berbagai pendampingan tentang pengembangan bisnis berbasis sociopreneur. Dalam pelatihan ini telah diberikan berbagai pengetahuan merancang ide bisnis dalam konteks pondok pesantren. Keberhasilan dari kegiatan ini tampak dari meningkatnya pengetahuan dan pemahaman para santri tentang perancangan ide bisnis, riset dan studi kelayakan bisnis, tata kelola produksi, pemasaran bisnis dan tata kelola keuangan. Dari hasil kegiatan pengabdian ini diketahui bahwa para santri telah mampu menyusun rerangka pengembangan bisnis pondok pesantren dengan mengedepankan semangat kewirausahaan sosial (sociopreneurship).

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.049
Threshold uncertainty score0.165

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0020.001
Scholarly communication0.0040.002
Open science0.0010.003
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0490.010

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.023
GPT teacher head0.297
Teacher spread0.275 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designQualitative
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePRAXIS Jurnal Pengabdian kepada MasyarakatSame topicEducation and Character DevelopmentFrench-language works237,207