Reshaping the corporate landscape: Navigating changes in real estate strategies
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The changing corporate landscape, influenced by global events and shifting workforce dynamics, has led to a new era of workplace adaptation and innovation. The COVID-19 pandemic has catalysed a significant shift towards remote work, with a profound impact on corporate real estate (CRE). As we navigate a post-pandemic world, it is clear that the traditional office model has transformed into a more flexible and multifaceted concept. The rise of remote and hybrid work has prompted businesses to rethink their real estate strategies, resulting in a surge in office vacancies and the need for creative solutions. Companies are at a crossroads of reinventing their physical workspaces and redefining their organisational cultures to address challenges such as rising delinquency rates, employee engagement and well-being. In the current business environment, organisations are prioritising the alignment of their future of work strategies with their mission and vision. They are taking advantage of their unutilised office spaces to reduce expenses, enhance the employee experience, promote sustainability and facilitate hybrid work arrangements. This transformation, however, necessitates a re-evaluation and optimisation of their real estate utilisation and functionality to cater to the needs of their ever-changing workforce. To accomplish this, corporate real estate professionals are looking for ways to adopt crucial strategies that foster efficiency and effectiveness in the workplace. This paper delves into these strategies and provides valuable insights into their successful implementation.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.003 | 0.006 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.004 | 0.006 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.014 | 0.009 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.005 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.004 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".