Spontaneous breaking of the <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>SO</mml:mi><mml:mo stretchy="false">(</mml:mo><mml:mn>2</mml:mn><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mo stretchy="false">)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math> symmetry in the Gross-Neveu model
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The canonical Gross-Neveu model for N two-component Dirac fermions in 2+1 dimensions suffers a continuous phase transition at a critical interaction gc1∼1/N at large N , at which its continuous symmetry SO(2N) is preserved and a discrete (Ising) symmetry becomes spontaneously broken. A recent mean-field calculation, however, points to an additional transition at a different critical gc2∼−Ngc1 , at which SO(2N)→SO(N)×SO(N) . To study the latter phase transition we rewrite the Gross-Neveu interaction g(ψ¯ψ)2 in terms of three different quartic terms for the single ( L=1 ) 4N -component real (Majorana) fermion, and then extend the theory to L>1 . This allows us to track the evolution of the fixed points of the renormalization group transformation starting from L≫1 , where one can discern three distinct critical points which correspond to continuous phase transitions into (1) SO(2N) -singlet mass-order-parameter, (2) SO(2N) -symmetric-tensor mass-order-parameters, and (3) SO(2N) -adjoint nematic-order-parameters, down to L=1 value that is relevant to the standard Gross-Neveu model. Below the critical value of Lc(N)≈0.35N for N≫1 only the Gross-Neveu critical point (1) still implies a diverging susceptibility for its corresponding ( SO(2N) -singlet) order parameter, whereas the two new critical points that existed at large L ultimately become equivalent to the Gaussian fixed point at L=1 . We interpret this metamorphosis of the SO(2N) -symmetric-tensor fixed point from critical to spurious as an indication that the transition at gc2 in the original Gross-Neveu model is turned first-order by fluctuations. Published by the American Physical Society 2024
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.009 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".