BREEDING BIOLOGY OF THE LOGGERHEAD SHRIKE LANIUS LUDOVICIANUS IN CENTRAL MEXICO
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The Loggerhead Shrike Lanius ludovicianus has an exceptionally broad distribution in North America, with the southernmost populations found in central Mexico. The species has experienced severe declines throughout its range, and thus, is of conservation concern, particularly in USA and Canada. Life history data is scarce for Mexico, where both resident and migratory populations are found. In this study we provide information on the breeding biology of a population of Loggerhead Shrikes near the southern limit of its distribution in central Mexico. Based on data from 70 nests over three breeding seasons (2007–2009), we estimated the average nest density as 0.85 nests/ha with most nests built in mesquite trees Prosopis laevigata. Average clutch initiation date was March 28, with variation among years. The breeding period averaged 3.5 months, starting at the end of February, and extending to early June. The laying period averaged 4.6 days, incubation averaged 18 days, and the average brooding period 16.6 days, for a total average of 39.2 days from egg laying to the end of brooding. Clutch size averaged 4.1 eggs (range 2–5) with a mode of four eggs. The nesting success for the three years combined was 64.3% (range 54.5–68.9%). Daily survival rate was estimated to be 0.749 using logistic exposure. The average number of fledglings at successful nests was 1.5. Predation was the main cause of nest failure, accounting for 35.7% of all active nests. In general, life history traits of this Mexican Loggerhead Shrike population are like those reported for breeding populations in more northern parts of its range; however, clutch size was smaller and average incubation period was significantly longer, probably because of latitudinally-related environmental factors.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.004 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".