MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4392909384 · doi:10.32920/25412746.v1

Load Distribution Factors in Straight and Skew Concrete I-Girder Bridges

2024· preprint· en· W4392909384 on OpenAlexaffabout
Atefeh Iranmanesh

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typepreprint
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicStructural Behavior of Reinforced Concrete
Canadian institutionsToronto Metropolitan University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsStructural engineeringGirderSkewEngineeringStiffnessSlabStructural loadShear (geology)Shear forceTruckFinite element methodMoment (physics)Geotechnical engineeringGeology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Skew bridges in modern highways have become increasingly popular for economic and aesthetic considerations. The current Canadian Highway Bridge Design Code (CHBDC) specifies skew factor equation for shear at the obtuse corner for braced steel I-girder bridges. However, skew factors for concrete I-girder bridges for girder moment and shear at obtuse and acute corners as well as middle supports due to CHBDC truck loading are yet unavailable. Also, CHBDC load distribution factor equations for moment and shear in straight bridges do not include the presence of concrete traffic barriers and intermediate diaphragms as integral parts of highway bridges. Moreover, literature review revealed that CHBDC overestimates the moment and shear at fatigue limit state design of slab-on-girder bridges. Despite the availability of computer software for bridge analysis, designers prefer simplified analysis methods to reduce the time and cost spent in the design. A practical-design-oriented parametric study was conducted, using the finite element modelling to address the shortcomings and gaps found in CHBDC. The first study included the analysis of straight and skew concrete I-girder bridges under dead load, while the second study included the analysis of such bridges under CHBDC truck loading conditions. The third study included the effect of concrete barrier stiffness and concrete intermediate diaphragms on the moment and shear distribution factors for this type of bridge. Different bridge configurations were considered to cover key parameters such as span length, skew angle, number of girders and girder spacing. The obtained results were compared with those available in CHDBC, AASHTO LRFD Bridge Design Specifications and previous research related to slab-on-girder bridges. Using the data generated from the parametric study, sets of empirical equations for moment and shear distribution factors for the studied bridge configurations under dead and live load were deduced to design such bridge types more reliably and economically. Results show that inclusion of intermediate diaphragms and concrete barriers built integrally with the deck slab generally affect bridge performance. This conclusion can be used to evaluate existing bridges since any additional girder strength would decide on keeping the bridge in service or address its structural deficiency.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.004
Threshold uncertainty score0.007

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0020.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.235
Teacher spread0.223 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2024
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicStructural Behavior of Reinforced ConcreteFrench-language works237,207