MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4392919545 · doi:10.1017/hyp.2024.27

<i>Getting It, Having It, Keeping It Up: Straight Men's Sexuality in Public &amp; Private</i>. Beth Montemurro, New Brunswick: Rutgers University Press, 2022. (ISBN: 978-1-9788-1782-1)

2024· article· en· W4392919545 on OpenAlexaffabout
Jonathan A. Allan

Bibliographic record

VenueHypatia · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPsychology
TopicSexuality, Behavior, and Technology
Canadian institutionsBrandon University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsAction (physics)Content (measure theory)SociologyMedia studiesManagementEconomicsMathematicsPhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

How do scholars working at the intersections of gender and sexuality make sense of men's sex lives, their understanding of sex, and their fears and anxieties about sex? Beth Montemurro's Getting It, Having It, Keeping It Up: Straight Men's Sexuality in Public & Private seeks to answer some of these questions and in so doing contributes to a growing body of scholarship on men's heterosexuality.Drawing on 94 interviews, conducted between 2014 and 2016, with straight men, Montemurro studies "how men's feelings about sex, sexual relationships, and their sexual selves have changed during their lifetime" (6).In this book, we learn that there are "three primary areas of concern," which are, quite simply, "getting it, having it, and keeping it up" (7).In her book, Montemurro argues that these primary concerns "allowed men to show their manhood" (7), recalling that gender is largely performative.The book itself is divided into three parts, each representing a part of the title.The first two chapters consider how men "get" sex, the next two chapters consider "having it," particularly men's expectations for sexual performance and proficiency, and finally, "keeping it up," which is as much about the temporal nature of the relationship as it is about erectile function and dysfunction.Together, then, readers are presented with a timely study that considers the nature of straight men's sexual lives, how they make sense of them, and what they desire of sexuality.Throughout the work, Montemurro argues that sexuality is key to understanding how men understand themselves, and perhaps most especially, their masculinity.To do this, Montemurro draws on the idea of "manhood acts" which are largely understood as "'practices and processes' involved in being seen as a man; those that 'signify possession of a masculine self'" (8).This idea of manhood acts, which comes from the work of Michael Schwalbe and Douglas Schrock, is used to profitable ends throughout Getting It, Having It, and Keeping It Up.Indeed, Montemurro is to be commended for enlivening this theoretical work in this book.This book contributes to ongoing discussions in the field of masculinity studies, and Montemurro introduces a new "type" of masculinity, "private masculinities," which she defines as "the way men demonstrate masculinity in intimate situations, where they are less likely to be policed" (16).I admit wholeheartedly that I have been critical of the proliferation of "types" of masculinity, but what strikes me as valuable here is that

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.080
Threshold uncertainty score0.267

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.002
Scholarly communication0.0020.004
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0800.034

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.060
GPT teacher head0.318
Teacher spread0.259 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueHypatiaSame topicSexuality, Behavior, and TechnologyFrench-language works237,207