MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4392925731 · doi:10.1007/s11063-024-11576-2

CLSTM-SNP: Convolutional Neural Network to Enhance Spiking Neural P Systems for Named Entity Recognition Based on Long Short-Term Memory Network

2024· article· en· W4392925731 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueNeural Processing Letters · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicDNA and Biological Computing
Canadian institutionsUniversité de Montréal
FundersSichuan Province Science and Technology Support ProgramNational Natural Science Foundation of China
KeywordsComputational intelligenceComputer scienceConvolutional neural networkTerm (time)Artificial neural networkLong short term memoryArtificial intelligencePattern recognition (psychology)Recurrent neural network

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Membrane computing is a type of parallel computing system (generally called P system) abstracted from information exchange mechanisms in biological cells, tissues, or neurons, which can process data in a distributed and interpretable manner. LSTM-SNP, the first model of long short-term memory networks based on parameterized nonlinear Spiking neural P systems, was proposed recently. However, a systematic understanding and leveraging of the LSTM-SNP model to address named entity recognition (NER) and other natural language processing (NLP) tasks are still lacking. The bottleneck of the NER task lies in the scarcity of data and the vague definition of entity edges. Most approaches center on dataset handling, and there have been few attempts to address the issue in Spiking neural P (SNP) systems. This paper proposes a model named CLSTM-SNP based on the LSTM-SNP, aiming to tackle the NER problem in the field of SNP systems for the first time. First, this study employs a CNN layer to obtain character-level characteristics. Second, GloVe word vectors are utilized as word representations. Third, the research employs the LSTM-SNP to analyze textual features. We subsequently studied CLSTM-SNP’s effectiveness in addressing NER problems on CoNLL-2003 and OntoNotes 5.0 datasets and compared it to the results of five other baseline methods. Our model CLSTM-SNP achieved a macro F1-score of 89.2 $$\%$$ <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"> <mml:mo>%</mml:mo> </mml:math> on CoNLL-2003 and 75.5 $$\%$$ <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"> <mml:mo>%</mml:mo> </mml:math> on OntoNotes 5.0, respectively. The performance of CLSTM-SNP and LSTM-SNP indicates a great potential for handling named entity recognition or other sequential tasks in NLP.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.618
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.030
GPT teacher head0.293
Teacher spread0.263 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it