CLSTM-SNP: Convolutional Neural Network to Enhance Spiking Neural P Systems for Named Entity Recognition Based on Long Short-Term Memory Network
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract Membrane computing is a type of parallel computing system (generally called P system) abstracted from information exchange mechanisms in biological cells, tissues, or neurons, which can process data in a distributed and interpretable manner. LSTM-SNP, the first model of long short-term memory networks based on parameterized nonlinear Spiking neural P systems, was proposed recently. However, a systematic understanding and leveraging of the LSTM-SNP model to address named entity recognition (NER) and other natural language processing (NLP) tasks are still lacking. The bottleneck of the NER task lies in the scarcity of data and the vague definition of entity edges. Most approaches center on dataset handling, and there have been few attempts to address the issue in Spiking neural P (SNP) systems. This paper proposes a model named CLSTM-SNP based on the LSTM-SNP, aiming to tackle the NER problem in the field of SNP systems for the first time. First, this study employs a CNN layer to obtain character-level characteristics. Second, GloVe word vectors are utilized as word representations. Third, the research employs the LSTM-SNP to analyze textual features. We subsequently studied CLSTM-SNP’s effectiveness in addressing NER problems on CoNLL-2003 and OntoNotes 5.0 datasets and compared it to the results of five other baseline methods. Our model CLSTM-SNP achieved a macro F1-score of 89.2 $$\%$$ % on CoNLL-2003 and 75.5 $$\%$$ % on OntoNotes 5.0, respectively. The performance of CLSTM-SNP and LSTM-SNP indicates a great potential for handling named entity recognition or other sequential tasks in NLP.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".