Frequency-Diverse Bunching Metasurface Antenna for Microwave Computational Imaging
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
A frequency-diverse bunching metasurface antenna (FDBMA) that can be used for microwave computational imaging (MCI) systems is proposed in this article. The proposed FDBMA can generate low-correlated radiation patterns with a reduced frequency interval of 20 MHz and a bunching angle of <inline-formula xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink"> <tex-math notation="LaTeX">$45\mathrm {^{\circ }}$ </tex-math></inline-formula> from 32 to 36 GHz. The frequency interval is reduced by combining a disordered cavity and an optimized frequency-diverse random metasurface. The directivity of the radiation patterns is improved by leveraging the joint-bunching method that combines the metal baffle, the Fresnel dielectric lens (FDL), the quasi-gradient random metasurface, and the random-coherent superposition comprehensively. The performance of the proposed FDBMA is evaluated in terms of the reflection coefficient, singular value decomposition (SVD) of the sensing matrix, and correlation coefficients (CCs) of the measurement modes. The reduced frequency interval and the bunching characteristic are also demonstrated. Finally, MCI experiments are implemented using the proposed FDBMA. Comparative experiments are also carried out to validate the advantage of reducing the frequency interval and improving the directivity.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it