MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4392930793 · doi:10.1186/s12890-024-02965-3

Virtual pulmonary rehabilitation approaches in patients with post COVID syndrome: a pilot study

2024· article· en· W4392930793 on OpenAlexafffund
Antônio Sarmento, Rachel Ilojegbe Adodo, Sandra C. Webber, Diana C. Sanchez‐Ramirez

Bibliographic record

VenueBMC Pulmonary Medicine · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicLong-Term Effects of COVID-19
Canadian institutionsHealth Sciences CentreUniversity of Manitoba
FundersHealth Sciences Centre Foundation
KeywordsMedicinePhysical therapyRehabilitationAdverse effectPulmonary rehabilitationQuality of life (healthcare)Patient satisfactionAerobic exerciseInternal medicineSurgeryNursing

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Background The characteristics of optimal virtual pulmonary rehabilitation (PR) for individuals with post-COVID syndrome (PCS) have not been identified. This study aimed to assess the feasibility, safety, and satisfaction associated with a virtual PR program with the exercise component delivered through group or self-directed sessions. Methods Adults with PCS-respiratory symptoms were randomly assigned to the video conference (PR VC ) or self-directed (PR SD ) group and completed an exercise program (aerobic, strengthening, and breathing exercises) three times/week for eight weeks. PR VC sessions were led by a physiotherapist via Zoom, whereas the PR SD group exercised individually following a pre-recorded video. Both groups received personalized exercise recommendations, education related to the condition, and a weekly follow up call. Satisfaction was assessed through a patient survey. Lung function, dyspnea, fatigue, sit-to-stand capacity, health-related quality of life, and participation were assessed pre- and post-PR. Results Fourteen PCS individuals (49 ± 9 years, 86% females) completed 83% of the sessions. All participants were satisfied with information provided by the therapist and frequency of data submission, whereas most were satisfied with the frequency and duration of exercise sessions (88% in PR VC and 83% in PR SD ). A higher proportion of participants in the PR VC (88%) were satisfied with the level of difficulty of exercises compared with the PR SD (67%), and 84% of the sample reported a positive impact of the program on their health. No adverse events were reported. Significant changes in sit-to-stand capacity ( p = 0.012, Cohen’s r = 0.67) and questions related to fatigue ( p = 0.027, Cohen’s r = 0.58), neurocognitive ( p = 0.045, Cohen’s r = 0.53), and autonomic ( p = 0.024, Cohen’s r = 0.60) domains of the DePaul Symptom Questionnaire short-form were also found between groups. Conclusion Virtual PR with exercises delivered via video conference or pre-recorded video were feasible, safe, and well-received by individuals with PCS. Trial registration NCT05003271 (first posted: 12/08/2021).

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.055
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.027
GPT teacher head0.283
Teacher spread0.256 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations12
Published2024
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueBMC Pulmonary MedicineSame topicLong-Term Effects of COVID-19French-language works237,207