Distributed Energy Sources Management using Shuffled Frog-Leaping Algorithm for Optimizing the Environmental and Economic Indices of Smart Microgrid
Bibliographic record
Abstract
When employing renewable energy within a smart micro grid (SMG), the management of distributed energy resources (DER) plays a crucial role in optimizing practical objectives of SMG. This study utilizes the Shuffled frog leaping algorithm (SFLA) to manage DER and implement demand response programs (DSP), aiming to optimize economic, technical and environmental problems of SMG. The modeling of renewable energy resources (RES) is a challenge due to its uncertainty, therefore, cumulative distribution function (CDF) is used for predicting the energy sources before its integration with SMG. The DER included in this study consists of the wind and solar energy, battery, micro turbine and the utility. This model is implemented in three different scenarios: a) basic grid operation, b) operation with maximum usage of renewable energy resources, c) operation with maximum usage of RES and DRP. The results obtained show the superiority of proposed SFLA algorithm in terms of avoiding pre-mature convergence which is a common challenge in optimization, and achieving global optimum for the proposed objectives. For validation, this model is implemented in MAT LAB considering different constraints.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".