Bibliographic record
Abstract
It is with great pleasure that we welcome you to the 2023 edition of the International Conference on Graphics and Interaction, held on November 2-3, 2023, at the Polytechnnic University of Tomar, Portugal, as a joint organization with the Eurographics Portuguese Chapter-GPCG.ICGI' 2023 aims to bring together researchers, teachers, and professionals in the areas of Computer Graphics, Image Processing, Computer Vision and Human-Computer Interaction, allowing the dissemination of concluded or ongoing work, as well as the exchange of experiences between the academic, industrial, and end-user communities.Similar to last year, this event includes a Computers & Graphics journal special section on Recent Advances in Graphics and Interaction.From the 16 submissions to this special section, 9 were accepted to the Computers & Graphics journal.The ICGI' 2023 had 23 conference papers (21 long, 2 short) and 5 poster submissions.From the conference papers, 14 were accepted as long papers, 5 as short papers, and 5 invited as posters, following a double-blind review process.These 19 contributions (14 long, 5 short) will be presented at the conference, as well as the 5 accepted posters.Similar to previous years, long
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.006 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".