Cryo-EM of the Nucleosome Core Particle Bound to Ran-RCC1 Reveals a Dynamic Complex
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Ras-related nuclear protein (Ran) is a member of the Ras superfamily of small guanosine triphosphatases (GTPases) and a regulator of multiple cellular processes. In healthy cells, the GTP-bound form of Ran is concentrated at chromatin, creating a Ran•GTP gradient that provides the driving force for nucleocytoplasmic transport, mitotic spindle assembly, and nuclear envelope formation. The Ran•GTP gradient is maintained by the regulator of chromatin condensation 1 (RCC1), a guanine nucleotide exchange factor that accelerates GDP/GTP exchange in Ran. RCC1 interacts with nucleosomes, which are the fundamental repeating units of eukaryotic chromatin. Here, we present a cryo-EM analysis of a trimeric complex composed of the nucleosome core particle (NCP), RCC1, and Ran. While the contacts between RCC1 and Ran in the complex are preserved compared with a previously determined structure of RCC1-Ran, our study reveals that RCC1 and Ran interact dynamically with the NCP and undergo rocking motions on the nucleosome surface. Furthermore, the switch 1 region of Ran, which plays an important role in mediating conformational changes associated with the substitution of GDP and GTP nucleotides in Ras family members, appears to undergo disorder–order transitions and forms transient contacts with the C-terminal helix of histone H2B. Nucleotide exchange assays performed in the presence and absence of NCPs are not consistent with an active role for nucleosomes in nucleotide exchange, at least in vitro . Instead, the nucleosome stabilizes RCC1 and serves as a hub that concentrates RCC1 and Ran to promote efficient Ran•GDP to Ran•GTP conversion.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".