MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4392956166 · doi:10.1063/5.0199342

Polymer free volume and its connection to the entanglement length and the plateau modulus via polymer mode-coupling theory and equation of state

2024· article· en· W4392956166 on OpenAlexafffund
Chi Pui Jeremy Wong, Phillip Choi

Bibliographic record

VenuePhysics of Fluids · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMaterials Science
TopicMaterial Dynamics and Properties
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Regina
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
Keywordsvan der Waals forcePhysicsIntermolecular forceQuantum entanglementPolymerCoupling (piping)Intramolecular forceDistribution functionConnection (principal bundle)GaussianChain (unit)ThermodynamicsRadial distribution functionPlateau (mathematics)Excluded volumeStatistical physicsMolecular dynamicsQuantum mechanicsMoleculeMaterials scienceNuclear magnetic resonanceMathematical analysis

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Using a many-chain system of Gaussian chains interacting with each other through the Lennard-Jones (LJ) potential, we demonstrate that there exists a connection between polymer fractional free volume (f) and the entanglement chain length (Ne). Here, f is determined by the generic van der Waals (GvdW) equation of state using the intermolecular radial distribution function [g(r)] of the Gaussian chain generated by the polymer reference interaction sites model while Ne by the polymer mode-coupling theory (PMCT) for strongly coupled macromolecules. The key concept in PMCT is that intermolecular forces experienced by a bead in a chain surrounded by other chains are strongly coupled to the site specific intramolecular radial distribution function. The calculated Gp and η of polyethylene with chain lengths from 500 to 2000 interacting with one another through the LJ potential agree well with experiment and molecular dynamics simulation.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.340
Threshold uncertainty score0.218

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.232
Teacher spread0.220 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2024
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePhysics of FluidsSame topicMaterial Dynamics and PropertiesFrench-language works237,207