MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Risk Factors for Term-Born Spastic Diplegic Cerebral Palsy: A Case-Control Study

2024· article· en· W4392976661 on OpenAlexafffundabout
Amaar Marefi, Nafisa Husein, Mary Dunbar, Deborah Dewey, Nicole Létourneau, Maryam Oskoui, Adam Kirton, Michael Shevell, John Andersen, David Buckley, Darcy Fehlings, Lee M. Burkholder, Louise Koclas, Ram Mishal, Nicole Pigeon, Ellen Wood

Bibliographic record

VenuePediatric Neurology · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicCerebral Palsy and Movement Disorders
Canadian institutionsAlberta Children's HospitalMcGill University Health CentreUniversity of CalgaryMcGill UniversityMontreal Children's Hospital
FundersCanadian Institutes of Health ResearchKids Brain Health NetworkPublic Health Agency of CanadaChildren's Hospital FoundationAlberta Children's Hospital FoundationPublic Health AgencyAlberta InnovatesMcGill University
KeywordsCerebral palsyMedicinePhysical medicine and rehabilitationSpasticTerm (time)PediatricsPhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

BACKGROUND: To identify if a predetermined set of potential risk factors are associated with spastic diplegic cerebral palsy (SDCP) in term-born children. METHODS: This is a case-control study with cases (n = 134) extracted from the Canadian Cerebral Palsy Registry (CCPR) and controls (n = 1950) from the Alberta Pregnancy Outcomes and Nutrition (APrON) study. Our primary variable was the SDCP phenotype in term-born children. Possible risk factors were selected a priori and include extreme maternal age (<19 or >35 years), pregnancy complications, maternal disease, substance use, perinatal infection, mode of delivery, perinatal adversity (i.e., neonatal encephalopathy presumably on the basis of intrapartum hypoxia-ischemia), sex, and birth weight. Multivariable analyses were used to calculate odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs). RESULTS: Multivariable analysis revealed associations between term-born SDCP and pregnancy complications (OR = 4.73; 95% CI = 1.91 to 10.56), maternal disease (OR = 2.52; 95% CI = 1.57 to 3.93), substance use (OR = 3.11; 95% CI = 2.10 to 4.55), perinatal infection (OR = 2.72; 95% CI 1.32 to 5.10), Caesarean section (OR = 2.35; 95% CI = 1.62 to 3.40), and perinatal adversity (OR = 2.91; 95% CI = 1.94 to 4.50). Multiple regression analysis revealed associations between SDCP and pregnancy complications (OR = 3.28; 95% CI 1.20 to 8.15), maternal disease (OR = 2.52; 95% CI 1.50 to 4.12), substance use (OR = 3.59; 95% CI 2.37 to 5.40), perinatal infection (OR = 3.78, 95% CI 1.71 to 7.72), Caesarean section (OR = 2.72; 95% CI 1.82 to 4.03), and perinatal adversity (OR = 4.16; 95% CI 2.67 to 6.70). INTERPRETATION: Antenatal (pregnancy complications, maternal disease, substance use) and perinatal (infections, Caesarean section, and perinatal adversity) risk factors are associated with an increased risk of SDCP in term-born children, suggesting variable interactions between risk factors to provide a clinicopathologic framework that is different from SDCP observed in preterm-born children.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.083
Threshold uncertainty score0.166

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.016
GPT teacher head0.273
Teacher spread0.258 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes3
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePediatric NeurologySame topicCerebral Palsy and Movement DisordersFrench-language works237,207