Observations of differences in electromagnetic velocity relative to anisotropy using a Lecher line and a standing electromagnetic wave
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This paper describes an experiment designed to observe potential changes in electromagnetic propagation velocity. It has been widely demonstrated that if the frequency of an electromagnetic wave is fixed, then the associated wavelength is causally related to c . Furthermore, the logical conclusion related to this known association (of frequency, wavelength, and light speed) is that, if the generated frequency during an experiment remains the same, and there is a velocity change in c , there would be causally related expansion or reduction in the associated wavelength. With the use of a Lecher line and a standing electromagnetic wave, the experimenter can measure changes in wavelength by measuring electrical output at an assigned position on a Lecher line. Results of this experiment demonstrated an obvious and experimentally repeatable phase change associated with rotation of the Lecher line. This phase change was demonstrated by a change in electrical output measured at the assigned location on the Lecher line. This experiment was repeated using various frequencies and voltage inputs into the Lecher line with obvious results that demonstrated an anisotropic difference. Further experiments were completed attempting to find an alternative hypothesis for the phase change noted in the original experiment, but these experiments were unable to identify an alternative cause of the phase change and consequently support the hypothesis that the phase change was directly related to anisotropy secondary to a change in the measured wavelength of the electromagnetic wave. Based upon the logical conclusions associated with this experiment and the results obtained, this experiment appears to demonstrate variable speed light. Furthermore, this discovery brings into question the theory that electromagnetic propagation though space is at the constant of c .
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".