Pengembangan Kawasan Wisata Air Terjun Pria Laot, Sabang
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstrak Wisata pegunungan Air Terjun Pria Laot memiliki panorama alam yang asri dan memiliki udara yang bersih ditengah hutan. Saat ini sarana pariwisata pada kawasan wisata Air Terjun Pria Laot belum dapat digunakan sepenuhnya oleh pengunjung. Tujuan penelitian ini adalah untuk mengetahui kondisi eksisting dan memberikan arahan pengembangan sarana dan prasarana obyek wisata Air Terjun Pria Laot. Metode penelitian ini menggunakan analisis deskriptif dan analisis SWOT dari hasil pengumpulan data primer yang dilakukan dengan observasi, wawancara serta data sekunder yang dikumpulkan dari bahan bacaan. Hasil yang didapatkan adalah kondisi eksisting kawasan wisata Air Terjun Pria Laot memiliki atraksi wisata yang indah dan alami,namun kondisi jalan harus dilakukan perbaikan, ketersediaan transportasi umum sangat minim, tempat parkir dan kamar ganti/toilet belum sesuai dengan Peraturan Menteri, belum adanya sistem pengelolaan sampah dan tidak adanya paket wisata yang melayani perjalanan ke obyek wisata. Strategi prioritas berdasarkan SWOT adalah menambahkan pengembangan kawasan wisata Air Terjun Pria Laot dalam rencana Pemerintah Kota Sabang, meningkatkan kualitas, perbaikan dan pengadaan terhadap sarana serta melakukan promosi objek wisata air terjun.A
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.003 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.005 | 0.003 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.037 | 0.010 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".