Piezoresistive Sensors Array for Multijoint Motion Estimation Application
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
With the emergence of digital healthcare, comes the need for an unobtrusive method for long-term motion monitoring. In recent years, wearable sensors have been utilized for motion monitoring to replace the conventional camera-based systems. Despite several attempts at measuring joint angles, designs for affordable and low power-consuming systems were lacking. This article explored the usage of ten low-cost, energy-efficient conductive polymer composite-based strain sensors composed of thermoplastic polyurethane elastomer matrix and multiwalled carbon nanotube (CNT) to create a smart clothing system for the measurement of elbow and shoulder joint angles. To overcome the time-varying and nonlinear behavior of the proposed strain sensor, a novel architecture of a convolutional neural network was designed to enhance the mapping of sensor signals to joint angles by extracting inter-sensor spatial and temporal information. Strain sensors with different concentrations were fabricated and characterized. It was found that 4 wt% CNT produced the highest sensitivity due to the highest degree of macrostructural damage. Motion monitoring performance was evaluated on one volunteer performing different actions and overall normalized root mean squared errors for elbow angle and shoulder Euler angles were 6.77%, 7.19%, 6.31%, and 8.22%, respectively.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it