Steelmakers: The Marriage of Entrepreneurship and Finance in New Glasgow and Halifax, 1883–1904
Bibliographic record
Abstract
One of the most technically advanced, fully integrated steel companies in Canada, the Nova Scotia Steel Company, began as Hope Iron Works, established in 1872 by Graham Fraser and Forrest McKay, two New Glasgow metal workers, with a small investment. In 1882, in response to the 1879 National Policy, Hope was incorporated into a new company with a board consisting mostly of New Glasgow merchants and entrepreneurs and John F. Stairs of Halifax. The Stairs' role in the development of “Scotia,” as it was called, has either been downplayed or largely ignored. From careful beginnings, the new company made rapid progress, installing new machinery and adding many new products. By the summer of 1901 the Nova Scotia Steel and Coal Co. was brimming with optimism and set about the task of becoming a fully integrated steel company. What had begun as a $4,000 investment in 1872 by two New Glasgow visionaries with their eight employees had become, by Nova Scotia standards, an industrial colossus with $4.5 million in assets and well over 1,500 employees at three locations, a triumph of inter-regional cooperation. The process of growth of this industrial giant from such humble beginnings is a tale of Maritime high finance in the era of the National Policy.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.008 | 0.009 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.005 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.007 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".