MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4393028122 · doi:10.1093/res/hgae016

<scp>Leah Orr</scp>. <i>Publishing the Woman Writer in England, 1670–1750</i>

2024· article· en· W4393028122 on OpenAlex
Dana Lew

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Review of English Studies · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicLiterature: history, themes, analysis
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPublishingHistoryArtLiterature

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Journal Article Leah Orr. Publishing the Woman Writer in England, 1670–1750 Get access Leah Orr. Publishing the Woman Writer in England, 1670–1750. Pp. xv + 329. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2023. Hardback, £78. Dana Lew Dana Lew University of Toronto, Canada Search for other works by this author on: Oxford Academic Google Scholar The Review of English Studies, hgae016, https://doi.org/10.1093/res/hgae016 Published: 21 March 2024 Article history Received: 20 January 2024 Editorial decision: 04 March 2024 Accepted: 05 March 2024 Corrected and typeset: 21 March 2024 Published: 21 March 2024

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.004
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.390
Threshold uncertainty score0.612

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.004
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.032
GPT teacher head0.261
Teacher spread0.228 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it