MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort

A VLBI Calibration System with Real-time Pulsar Gating for FRB Localization using CHIME/FRB Outriggers

2024· preprint· en· W4393028524 on OpenAlexafffundabout
Aaron B. Pearlman

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typepreprint
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicPulsars and Gravitational Waves Research
Canadian institutionsMcGill University
FundersFonds de recherche du Québec – Nature et technologiesMcGill Space InstituteMcGill University
KeywordsVery-long-baseline interferometryPulsarRadio telescopePhysicsTelescopeFast radio burstCalibrationOutriggerGalaxyAstrophysicsAstronomyGeology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Several thousand fast radio burst (FRB) sources have been discovered using the Canadian Hydrogen Intensity Mapping Experiment (CHIME) radio telescope, as part of the CHIME/FRB project. Currently, CHIME/FRB is able to localize most FRBs to a limiting precision of several arcminutes, which can be improved to subarcminute precision for some FRB sources through offline analysis of their baseband data. This allows only the most nearby sources to be robustly associated with a host galaxy. Using three new Outrigger telescopes located at transcontinental distances from CHIME, the CHIME/FRB Outriggers project will improve the localization capabilities of CHIME/FRB. Together, these radio telescopes will form a wide field of view, very long baseline interferometry (VLBI) array that will enable FRBs discovered by CHIME/FRB to be localized to a limiting precision of ~50 milliarcseconds. The astrometric position of each FRB will be determined using calibration solutions derived from well-localized radio pulsars and compact, steady radio sources. We present an overview of the VLBI calibration system that will be employed within the CHIME/FRB Outrigger project to achieve high precision FRB localizations, which will enable studies of a large number of FRB host galaxies and local environments.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.018
Threshold uncertainty score0.035

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.002
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0020.002
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0070.006

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.019
GPT teacher head0.330
Teacher spread0.312 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2024
Admission routes3
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicPulsars and Gravitational Waves Research→French-language works237,207→