MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4393029558 · doi:10.11646/zootaxa.5428.3.2

Review of the subgenera Metopius Panzer and Peltastes Illiger of the genus Metopius Panzer (Hymenoptera: Ichneumonidae: Metopiinae) from Japan

2024· article· en· W4393029558 on OpenAlexaff
Shunsuke Morishita, Kyohei Watanabe

Bibliographic record

VenueZootaxa · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicHymenoptera taxonomy and phylogeny
Canadian institutionsHatch (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBiologyIchneumonidaeHymenopteraSubgenusZoologyGenusParasitoid

Abstract

Japanese species of the subgenera Metopius Panzer and Peltastes Illiger of the genus Metopius Panzer are reviewed. Two species of the former and six species of the latter are recognized in the Japanese fauna. Metopius (M.) anxius Wesmael, 1849, M. (P.) pinatorius Brullé, 1846, and M. (P.) scrobiculatus Hartig, 1838 are newly recorded from Japan. The subgeneric position of M. (Ceratopius) hakiensis Matsumura, 1912 is changed from the subgenus Ceratopius to the subgenus Peltastes. The following three synonyms are proposed: M. (P.) arakawai (Uchida, 1930) = M. (P.) hakiensis; M. (P.) oharai Kusigemati, 1983 = M. (P.) scrobiculatus; Metopius (P.) sapporensis Uchida, 1930 = M. (P.) pinatorius. New distribution records and keys to the Japanese subgenera and species of this genus are also provided.

Stored with the screening record, where it is evidence for the labels above.

How this classification was reachedexpand

The three-model screen

all 5,600 screened works →

All three models called this out of scope.

stratum: aff_core · design weight: 5595.24 (the sample is stratified; any rate computed without the weight is wrong)
Claude Opus 4.8OUT
genre: empirical
about Canada: no
confidence: high

Taxonomic revision of Metopius wasp subgenera in Japan; insect systematics.

GPT-5.6 (high)OUT
genre: empirical
about Canada: no
confidence: high

It revises the taxonomy of Japanese wasps, not research practice.

Grok 4.5OUT
genre: empirical
about Canada: no
confidence: high

Taxonomic review of Japanese Metopius wasps; entomology systematics.

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.006
Threshold uncertainty score0.000

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.001
Bibliometrics0.0060.008
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.002
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.016
GPT teacher head0.214
Teacher spread0.198 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueZootaxaSame topicHymenoptera taxonomy and phylogenyFrench-language works237,207