MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4393031514 · doi:10.1212/cpj.0000000000200271

Clinical Predictors of Postmortem Amyloid and Nonamyloid Cerebral Small Vessel Disease in Middle-Aged to Older Adults

2024· article· en· W4393031514 on OpenAlexafffund
Caroline Dallaire‐Théroux, Colin Smith, Simon Duchesne

Bibliographic record

VenueNeurology Clinical Practice · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicIntracerebral and Subarachnoid Hemorrhage Research
Canadian institutionsCentre hospitalier de l'Université Laval
FundersCanadian Institutes of Health Research
KeywordsDementiaMedicineCerebral amyloid angiopathyClinical Dementia RatingInternal medicineEtiologyDiseaseCognitive declineLogistic regressionHyperintensityVascular dementiaPathologyMagnetic resonance imagingRadiology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Background and Objectives: Sporadic cerebral small vessel disease (CSVD) is a class of important pathologic processes known to affect the aging brain and to contribute to cognitive impairment. We aimed to identify clinical risk factors associated with postmortem CSVD in middle-aged to older adults. Methods: , and cognitive status were assessed as potential predictors. Results: Forty percent of our sample had a clinical diagnosis of dementia (AD = 33, VCI = 26 and mixed = 5) while others were cognitively healthy (n = 96). The mean age at death was 73.8 (SD 14.1) years, and 40% were female. The presence of none-to-mild vs moderate-to-severe nonamyloid CSVD was predicted by our model with good accuracy (area under the curve [AUC] = 0.84, sensitivity [SEN] = 72%, specificity [SPE] = 95%), with the most significant clinical predictors being age, history of cerebrovascular events, and cognitive impairment. The presence of CAA pathology was also predicted with high accuracy (AUC = 0.86, SEN = 93%, SPE = 79%). Significant predictors included alcohol intake, history of cerebrovascular events, and cognitive impairment. In a subset of atypical dementias (n = 24), our models provided poor predictive performance for both nonamyloid CSVD (AUC = 0.50) and CAA (AUC = 0.43). Discussion: CSVD pathology can be predicted with high accuracy based on clinical factors in patients within the spectrum of AD, VCI, and normal aging. Whether this prediction can be enhanced by the addition of fluid and neuroimaging biomarkers warrants additional study. Improving our understanding of clinical determinants of vascular brain health may lead to novel strategies in the prevention and treatment of vascular etiologies contributing to cognitive decline. Classification of Evidence: This study provides Class II evidence that selected clinical factors accurately distinguish between middle-aged to older adults with and without cerebrovascular small vessel disease (amyloid and nonamyloid) pathology.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.004
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.024
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMetaresearch, Meta-epidemiology (narrow), Research integrity
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.063
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0040.024
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.042
GPT teacher head0.375
Teacher spread0.333 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2024
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueNeurology Clinical PracticeSame topicIntracerebral and Subarachnoid Hemorrhage ResearchFrench-language works237,207