Thermal equation of state of rhodium to 191 GPa and 2700 K using double-sided flash laser heating in a diamond anvil cell
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The phase behavior of rhodium (Rh) metal has been studied to 191 GPa and 2700 K using a combination of room-temperature isothermal compression and double-sided flash laser heating experiments. The isothermal compression data have been fitted with a second-order adapted polynomial of order L equation of state (EoS) with best-fitting parameters of V0=13.764(2)Å3/atom , K0=258(3)GPa, and K′=5.36(9) . Two-dimensional maps of the uniaxial stress component t are presented for Rh at different pressures showing the spatial distribution of the local stress state of a relatively high-yield strength material encased in a Bi pressure medium. In addition, a simple, thermal pressure equation-of-state model, based on a single Einstein temperature, has been fitted to the high-pressure-temperature data up to 2700 K at 148 GPa and ambient-pressure thermal expansion data up to 1982 K. Also determined are the best-fitting parameters to reproduce the thermal EoS within the two-dimensional integration software. The optimized parameters are V0=13.764Å3/atom , K0=260.54GPa , K′=5.114 , αT=2.99×10−5 K−1 , ∂αT/∂T=1.27×10−9 K−2 , ∂K0/∂T=−6.43×10−5GPa/K , and ∂K′/∂T=−9.3×10−10K−1 . Published by the American Physical Society 2024
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".