MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4393042773 · doi:10.14740/wjon1818

Characterization of Asciminib-Resistant Philadelphia Chromosome-Positive Cells

2024· article· en· W4393042773 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Seiichi Okabe, Mitsuru Moriyama, Akihiko Gotoh

Bibliographic record

VenueWorld Journal of Oncology · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicChronic Myeloid Leukemia Treatments
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPonatinibMedicineMyeloid leukemiaPhiladelphia chromosomeDasatinibMutationChronic myelogenous leukemiaCancer researchTyrosine kinaseLeukemiaGeneImmunologyInternal medicineGeneticsImatinibReceptorBiologyChromosomal translocation

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Background: Asciminib is approved for treating patients with chronic-phase chronic myeloid leukemia who were previously treated with two or more tyrosine kinase inhibitors or those with T315I mutation. However, the mechanisms underlying asciminib resistance remain unclear. Methods: In this study, we established a new asciminib-resistant cell line. We examined BCR::ABL1 gene mutation analysis and the effects of conventional chronic myelogenous leukemia inhibitors. Results: Direct sequencing revealed Y139D and T315I mutations in asciminib-resistant cells. Ponatinib and omacetaxine were effective against asciminib-resistant cells. Conclusions: Y139D and T315I mutations are extremely resistant to asciminib. Ponatinib and omacetaxine show potential for treating asciminib-resistant chronic myeloid leukemia. World J Oncol. 2024;15(2):319-324 doi: https://doi.org/10.14740/wjon1818

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.388
Threshold uncertainty score0.794

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.018
GPT teacher head0.304
Teacher spread0.286 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations5
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueWorld Journal of OncologySame topicChronic Myeloid Leukemia TreatmentsFrench-language works237,207