MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4393044045 · doi:10.1038/s41591-024-02879-x

Understanding the provenance and quality of methods is essential for responsible reuse of FAIR data

2024· letter· en· W4393044045 on OpenAlexafffund
Tracey L. Weissgerber, Małgorzata Anna Gazda, Gustav Nilsonne, Gerben ter Riet, Kelly D. Cobey, Julia Prieß-Buchheit, Jorge Noro, Robert Schulz, Joeri K. Tijdink, Evgeny Bobrov, Alexandra Bannach‐Brown, Delwen Franzen, Ugo Moschini, Florian Naudet, Ulrich Mansmann, Maia Salholz‐Hillel, Anita Bandrowski, Malcolm Macleod

Bibliographic record

VenueNature Medicine · 2024
Typeletter
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicResearch Data Management Practices
Canadian institutionsWilfrid Laurier UniversityUniversity of OttawaUniversité de Montréal
FundersDirectorate for Biological SciencesCentre Hospitalier Universitaire de RennesIstituto Italiano di TecnologiaGöteborgs UniversitetUniversidade de CoimbraInstitut Universitaire de FranceEuropean CommissionInstitut National de la Santé et de la Recherche MédicaleKarolinska InstitutetBerlin Institute of HealthNational Institute of General Medical SciencesBundesministerium für Bildung und ForschungUniversity of Ottawa
KeywordsProvenanceReuseQuality (philosophy)Data qualityComputational biologyComputer scienceBiologyBusinessEcologyEpistemologyPaleontologyPhilosophy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex
No abstract in any covered source. Its absence is recorded, not treated as a negative.

No abstract. This is not a gap in this database; OpenAlex has none either. 23.3% of the frame is in this state, and the screen finds HALF as much metaresearch here, so the absence is a measured bias rather than a missing field.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.132
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.361
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMetaresearch, Open science
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: Reproducibility · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Commentary · Consensus signal: Commentary
Teacher disagreement score0.995
Threshold uncertainty score0.697

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.1320.361
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.003
Bibliometrics0.0020.003
Science and technology studies0.0130.028
Scholarly communication0.0170.022
Open science0.0050.010
Research integrity0.0980.101
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0070.005

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.504
GPT teacher head0.548
Teacher spread0.044 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

Study designTheoretical or conceptual
DomainReproducibility
GenreCommentary

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations10
Published2024
Admission routes2
Has abstractno

Explore more

Same venueNature MedicineSame topicResearch Data Management PracticesFrench-language works237,207