MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4393045612 · doi:10.24874/jsscm.2023.17.01.09

DESIGN OF A FAST ADAPTIVE NEURO-SLIDING MODE CONTROLLER FOR PIEZOELECTRIC ACTUATORS

2023· article· en· W4393045612 on OpenAlexaff
Amor Ounissi, Azeddine Kaddouri, Rachid Abdessemed

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of the Serbian Society for Computational Mechanics · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAdvanced MEMS and NEMS Technologies
Canadian institutionsUniversité de Moncton
Fundersnot available
KeywordsControl theory (sociology)Robustness (evolution)ActuatorAdaptive controlController (irrigation)Computer scienceTrajectoryTracking errorTerminal sliding modeAttractorNoise (video)Control engineeringSliding mode controlEngineeringNonlinear systemMathematicsControl (management)Artificial intelligence

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In this paper, an adaptive controller is applied to the piezoelectric actuators, PEA, in order to handle them. Our paper deals with the design of a new adaptive neuro-fast terminal sliding mode controller. The new adaptive control law using the terminal attractor concept is used in the finite time control procedure of the non-linear model. The PEA converges to the desired trajectory in a very short time. The controller allows for obtaining good results in terms of trajectory tracking and error minimization. The adaptive scheme is used to reduce the high noise order presented in piezo materials, especially at the micro-positioning level. The results of the simulations undertaken have demonstrated the robustness of the proposed approach and make it possible not only to guarantee the high accuracy of the monitoring but also to maintain the high stability of the piezoelectric actuator.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.006

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.026
GPT teacher head0.249
Teacher spread0.224 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of the Serbian Society for Computational MechanicsSame topicAdvanced MEMS and NEMS TechnologiesFrench-language works237,207