MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4393052913 · doi:10.2172/1856533

RACEE Energy Efficiency Implementation for Holy Cross, Alaska (Final Report)

2021· report· en· W4393052913 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Vanessa Stevens, Dave Messier

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typereport
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicOffshore Engineering and Technologies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsEfficient energy useComputer scienceEngineeringElectrical engineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The Deg Hit’an Athabascan village of Holy Cross is located along the Ghost Creek Slough bank of the Yukon River. Holy Cross is home to almost 170 people who are accustomed to both the advantages and disadvantages of living off the road system - the nearest major road is some 300 miles to the east. On one hand, Holy Cross residents have greater access to practicing traditional activities like subsistence hunting and fishing. Families in the area have fished, hunted, and gathered food together for many generations and the land is imbued with this special history. But compared to Alaskans living on the road system, the residents of Holy Cross pay higher prices for basic necessities since goods are transported via air service and seasonal barge shipments. Holy Cross residents also accumulate higher energy costs, as diesel fuel is the primary fuel source for heating and lighting and costs over $6 per gallon. Affording these high living costs becomes a barrier for Holy Cross residents who want to stay in the village or participate in subsistence activities requiring transportation by boat or ATV. In 2010, the community used 674,638 kilowatt-hours (kWh) of electricity and 196,739 gallons of diesel, which equated to a combined energy use of 29,452 million British thermal units (MMBtu), about 165 MMBtu per capita. Desiring to reduce their energy consumption, Holy Cross participated in the 2015 U.S. Department of Energy’s (DOE) Remote Alaska Communities Energy Efficiency (RACEE) Competition. They and 7 other communities received financial and technical assistance to implement energy savings solutions, including heat recovery and solar PV systems, building insulation, and lighting retrofits. These measures are expected to reduce the community’s energy consumption by 15% and costs by over $50,000 annually. By 2021, the community is expected to have decreased electricity use by 100,000 kWh (15% decrease) and 10,000 gallons of diesel. Because of this reduction, the community will spend less on energy costs and is expected to save $100,000 annually. In addition to the realized energy and cost savings, the RACEE project benefitted the Holy Cross labor force. Due to the remote nature of Alaska communities like Holy Cross, jobs are difficult to come by. A majority of the Holy Cross RACEE grant work utilized local labor, providing valued employment for these residents.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.004
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.141
Threshold uncertainty score0.280

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0040.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0020.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0370.007

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.030
GPT teacher head0.314
Teacher spread0.284 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2021
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicOffshore Engineering and TechnologiesFrench-language works237,207