Diagnosis, management and long‐term outcome of four cases of carpal flexor retinaculum desmopathy
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Summary Four cases of flexor retinaculum desmopathy following an accident during the landing phase of jumping and their outcomes are discussed, and an overview of the subjects is provided. The four horses presented with a sudden onset of severe lameness during landing after jumping, which markedly decreased in the first few days. In all cases, the painful area was not localisable on the first day; however, marked swelling was observed on the second day and in all cases, the injury to the carpal flexor retinaculum was visible on ultrasound. The horses were sound in a straight line at 9 (Case 1), 4 (Case 2) and 2 (Case 3) weeks after the injury. Case 4 was not presented until 8 weeks after the incident. During subsequent examination, Case 4 was found to be sound, although it had not returned to training. The owner reported the lameness ended 4 weeks after the incident. All the horses successfully returned to their former competition levels and did not show any problems related to the carpal flexor retinaculum. However, there were significant differences in the regeneration times among the cases, ranging from 5 to 21 months.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".