MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W4393055889 · doi:10.21203/rs.3.rs-4087685/v1

Clinical Characteristics and Prognostic Markers of Aggressive Subtypes of Thyroid Cancer: A Retrospective Chart Review Study

2024· preprint· en· W4393055889 on OpenAlexaff
Suhaib Radi, Mazin Al-Maghrabi, Saleh Binmahfooz, Miguel Franco, Richard J. Payne, Michael Tamilia

Bibliographic record

VenueResearch Square · 2024
Typepreprint
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicThyroid Cancer Diagnosis and Treatment
Canadian institutionsMcGill University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineRetrospective cohort studyThyroid cancerCancerChartOncologyThyroidInternal medicineStatistics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Importance: The prevalence of thyroid cancer has increased significantly. Aggressive subtypes of papillary thyroid cancer (AG-PTC) and poorly differentiated thyroid cancer (PDTC) are malignancies that lie between well-differentiated and undifferentiated cancers. The management of well-differentiated cancers has been established in the literature; however, that of AG-PTC and PDTC needs to be clarified. Objective: To describe the clinicopathological characteristics and genomic landscape of AG-PTC and PDTC and to assess their prognostic value. We primarily aimed to determine the association between persistent or recurrent thyroid cancer and clinicopathological prognostic markers Design: A retrospective chart review of patients with thyroid cancer over the last 10 years Setting: Single center Participants: Patients with AG-PTC or high-grade follicular cell-derived malignancies (HGFM) were included in the analysis. HGFM comprised of patients with PDTC & differentiated high-grade thyroid carcinoma. The clinical presentation, pathological characteristics, molecular markers, specific treatments, and clinical outcomes were compared between the groups. Exposure(s): Main Outcome(s) and Measure(s): Results: Of the 3,244 thyroid cancer charts reviewed, 136 met the criteria for AG-PTC and HGFM. The mean age at diagnosis was 49 years, with a predominance of women. The median follow-up duration was 3 years. The rate of persistent or recurrent disease was 40.3% in the AG-PTC group and 29.3% in the HGFM group, 4.5% died in the AG-PTC group, and 1.8% died in the HGFM group. The presence of vascular, lymphovascular invasion and extrathyroidal extension were associated with a higher incidence of persistent or recurrent disease (Hazard ratio: 2.5, 3.8, and 4.2, respectively; p < 0.05). When the Ki-67 index was divided into five groups, the recurrence rate was higher in the ≥ 20% Ki-67 group compared to lower Ki67 (P-value of 0.017). Although there was a numerical increase in the rate of persistent/recurrent disease among BRAF-mutated patients, it didn’t reach statistical significance. No difference was observed in recurrence based on percentage of aggressive/poorly differentiated tumor involvement. Conclusions and Relevance: Possible prognostic markers for predicting recurrent and persistent thyroid cancers and guiding therapy for AG-PTC and HGFM include vascular/lymphovascular invasion, extrathyroidal extension, and the proliferative index Ki-67.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.012
Threshold uncertainty score0.024

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.003
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.070
GPT teacher head0.466
Teacher spread0.396 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueResearch Square→Same topicThyroid Cancer Diagnosis and Treatment→French-language works237,207→