MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4393060258 · doi:10.29173/cjfy30015

Book Review of Blackmore, Mary Jayne. (2020). Balancing Bountiful: What I Learned about Feminism from my Polygamist Grandmothers. Halfmoon Bay: Caitlin Press.

2024· article· fr· W4393060258 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Kate Sabrowski

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian Journal of Family and Youth / Le Journal Canadien de Famille et de la Jeunesse · 2024
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicMarriage and Sexual Relationships
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBayFeminismPsychologySociologyHistoryGender studiesArchaeology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Balancing Bountiful," sheds light on the author's empowering journey and evolution from a once sheltered child to a curious feminist seeking liberation within the polygamist community of Bountiful, British Columbia.Blackmore, the fifth child of "[her] father's 150 children," provides a reflective account of her experiences growing up within a fundamentalist Mormon community and alludes to how experiences with religion, education, and the media prompt her to ponder what the right type of woman, family, and community are (p.9).Though she had an idyllic childhood centred on togetherness, Blackmore recounts struggling to find her place as a woman within the narrow Mormon narrative, ultimately causing her to leave the church and community.Blackmore's memoir offers insight into the strict inner workings of her polygamist community and challenges the harmful stereotypes about her family that the media perpetuates.Blackmore describes growing up during the "glory days of Bountiful," where children "worked hard and played harder" (p.9).While Blackmore spent a fair share of her childhood gallivanting around the Skimmerhorn mountains and getting dirty in the mud, the anticipation of

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.006
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Scholarly communication, Research integrity
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.382
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0060.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.002
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.023
GPT teacher head0.284
Teacher spread0.260 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanadian Journal of Family and Youth / Le Journal Canadien de Famille et de la JeunesseSame topicMarriage and Sexual RelationshipsFrench-language works237,207