A genetic mouse model of lean-NAFLD unveils sexual dimorphism in the liver-heart axis
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Lean patients with NAFLD may develop cardiac complications independently of pre-existent metabolic disruptions and comorbidities. To address the underlying mechanisms independent of the development of obesity, we used a murine model of hepatic mitochondrial deficiency. The liver-heart axis was studied as these mice develop microvesicular steatosis without obesity. Our results unveil a sex-dependent phenotypic remodeling beyond liver damage. Males, more than females, show fasting hypoglycemia and increased insulin sensitivity. They exhibit diastolic dysfunction, remodeling of the circulating lipoproteins and cardiac lipidome. Conversely, females do not manifest cardiac dysfunction but exhibit cardiometabolic impairments supported by impaired mitochondrial integrity and β-oxidation, remodeling of circulating lipoproteins and intracardiac accumulation of deleterious triglycerides. This study underscores metabolic defects in the liver resulting in significant sex-dependent cardiac abnormalities independent of obesity. This experimental model may prove useful to better understand the sex-related variability, notably in the heart, involved in the progression of lean-NAFLD.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.007 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".