MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W4393073134 · doi:10.1158/1538-7445.am2024-1022

Abstract 1022: Integration of cerebrospinal fluid methylome and proteome can obviate the need for biopsy in central nervous system lymphoma

2024· article· en· W4393073134 on OpenAlexaff
Alex Landry, Jeffrey Zuccato, Vikas Patil, Mathew Voisin, Justin Z. Wang, Yosef Ellenbogen, Chloe Gui, Andrew Ajisebutu, Farshad Nassiri, Gelareh Zadeh

Bibliographic record

VenueCancer Research · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicGlioma Diagnosis and Treatment
Canadian institutionsUniversity Health NetworkUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCerebrospinal fluidProteomeLiquid biopsyLymphomaMedicineBiopsyPathologyBrain biopsyPrimary central nervous system lymphomaCentral nervous systemCancerBiologyBioinformaticsInternal medicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Background: The diagnosis of intra-axial brain tumors requires histopathological examination of tissue obtained by neurosurgery in current clinical practice, which comes with inherent risks. Some patients, particularly those with primary CNS lymphoma (PCNSL), only undergo surgery to obtain a diagnosis and do not derive any therapeutic benefit from surgical resection or debulking. Less-invasive techniques for diagnosis, such as liquid biopsy, therefore provides an opportunity to mitigate surgical risk in these patients. Methods: Patients with histopathology confirmed glioblastoma (GBM, IDH wild type), brain metastases (BM), and PCNSL with accompanying cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) samples were included in our study. Cell-free DNA methylation profiling and shotgun proteomics were obtained for all patients and used to train classifiers to distinguish each tumour entity from others. Specifically, binomial elastic net regression models were built by combining both data modalities using established early and late integration paradigms and performance was compared to classifiers built from individual data types alone. Each model was repeated 100 fold and performance assessed on an untouched testing subset. Results: Our cohort includes 20 patients with GBM, 17 with BM, and 14 with PCNSL, each with matching CSF cell-free DNA methylation and shotgun proteomic profiling. We show that these data can be integrated to fully discriminate PCNSL from its major diagnostic counterparts with a perfect median AUC of 1.00 (95% CI 1-1) and 100% specificity. Integrated "lymphoma vs other" models significantly outperform models trained on methylation or protein data alone, though the same dramatic improvement was not demonstrated in GBM or BM, suggesting synergistic biological information is specific to lymphoma. Conclusions: There is a critical need to diagnose patients with intra-axial tumours, particularly PCNSL, without relying on invasive and costly surgery. We present the most specific and accurate CNS lymphoma classifier to date by integrating the methylome and proteome of CSF. This has the potential for immediate clinical utility, eliminating the need for biopsy in an important subset of these patients. Citation Format: Alex P. Landry, Jeffrey A. Zuccato, Vikas Patil, Mathew Voisin, Justin Z. Wang, Yosef Ellenbogen, Chloe Gui, Andrew Ajisebutu, Farshad Nassiri, Gelareh Zadeh. Integration of cerebrospinal fluid methylome and proteome can obviate the need for biopsy in central nervous system lymphoma [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2024; Part 1 (Regular Abstracts); 2024 Apr 5-10; San Diego, CA. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2024;84(6_Suppl):Abstract nr 1022.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.007

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.067
GPT teacher head0.389
Teacher spread0.323 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCancer Research→Same topicGlioma Diagnosis and Treatment→French-language works237,207→