MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W4393086019 · doi:10.1158/1538-7445.am2024-4529

Abstract 4529: Characterization of PARP inhibitor combination therapies in triple-negative breast cancer

2024· article· en· W4393086019 on OpenAlexaff
Elicia Fyle, Djihane Abdesselam, Mallory I. Frederick, Saima Hassan

Bibliographic record

VenueCancer Research · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicPARP inhibition in cancer therapy
Canadian institutionsUniversité de Montréal
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPARP inhibitorBreast cancerTriple-negative breast cancerCancerOncologyMedicineInternal medicinePoly ADP ribose polymeraseBiologyGeneticsPolymeraseDNA

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Introduction: Triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) is the most aggressive type of breast cancer, with limited targeted treatment options. TNBC patients can, however, benefit from targeted drugs known as Poly (ADP-Ribose) Polymerase inhibitors (PARPi). PARPi disrupt DNA repair pathways by targeting tumors with germline BRCA1/2 mutations (BRCA-MUT) via synthetic lethality and PARP-DNA trapping mechanisms. Only 15-20% of the TNBC patient population are BRCA-MUT and can thus benefit from PARPi. However, preclinical studies and clinical trials have suggested that PARPi can also be effective in BRCA1/2 wild-type (BRCA-WT) cancer cells that have genomic phenotypes similar to BRCA-MUT cells, a phenomenon known as BRCAness. Previously, we used whole transcriptome analysis in a panel of TNBC cell lines to identify a 63-gene signature for BRCAness. The 63-gene signature was shown to predict response to PARPi with an accuracy of 86% in patient-derived xenografts, and was present in 45% of TNBC patients. We hypothesize that targeting genes in this 63-gene signature can enhance the sensitivity of PARPi in BRCA-WT and BRCA-MUT TNBC cells. Our aim is to identify and target genes from this signature that are involved in DNA synthesis and repair pathways, to identify effective combination strategies with PARPi. Methods: Using a PARPi-resistant TNBC cell line, MDAMB231, we carried out an siRNA screen of six genes from the 63-gene signature (BARD1, BUB1, RRM2, FEN1, EXO1, and USP1), chosen based on DNA repair functions and small-molecule inhibitor availability. The gene knockdowns were combined with the application of a potent PARPi, talazoparib, to determine the impact on DNA damage and cell death in TNBC cell lines. We then focused on targeting FEN1 function with the inhibitor LNT1. Using the Chou & Talalay combination index, we combined LNT1 with talazoparib to determine drug synergy in TNBC cell lines. Results: The individual siRNA knockdowns of BARD1, BUB1, FEN1, EXO1, and USP1, in combination with talazoparib, led to increased γ-H2AX and cleaved-caspase 3 levels, indicating augmentation of DNA damage and apoptosis. In particular, the FEN1 inhibitor, LNT1 demonstrated efficacy as a single-agent and synergy in combination with talazoparib in both BRCA-WT and BRCA-MUT TNBC cell lines. Conclusions: The siRNA screens, in combination with talazoparib, show that there are indeed targets within the 63-gene signature that can be used with PARPi that enhance DNA damage and cell death. The drug synergy shown between LNT1 and talazoparib in both BRCA-WT and BRCA-MUT TNBC cells suggests that LNT1 with PARPi could be an effective targeted combination approach, with great potential for TNBC patients. Citation Format: Elicia Fyle, Djihane Abdesselam, Mallory Frederick, Saima N. Hassan. Characterization of PARP inhibitor combination therapies in triple-negative breast cancer [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2024; Part 1 (Regular Abstracts); 2024 Apr 5-10; San Diego, CA. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2024;84(6_Suppl):Abstract nr 4529.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.007

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.075
GPT teacher head0.430
Teacher spread0.355 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCancer Research→Same topicPARP inhibition in cancer therapy→French-language works237,207→