Abstract 6029: 225Ac/89Zr labeled anti nectin 4 radioimmunoconjugates as theranostics against nectin 4 positive triple negative breast cancer
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract Nectin4 (N4) is a biomarker that is overexpressed in ~62% of triple negative breast cancer (TNBC) and its lack of expression in normal tissues makes it an ideal target for the therapy and PET imaging of TNBC. Methods: We developed a fully human antibody against nectin 4 (anti N4) using phage display. Anti N4 was radiolabeled with 89Zr & 225Ac, respectively, for imaging & radiotherapy using TNBC xenograft & syngeneic mouse models. TNBC murine 4T1 cells were transduced with human N4 and N4 expression was confirmed by FACS. Biodistribution & PET imaging of 89Zr anti N4 radioimmunoconjugate (RIC) was studied in mice bearing N4 positive xenografts. Dosimetry of 225Ac anti N4 was studied in healthy mice & the therapeutic efficacy was evaluated for 90 days in mice bearing MDA MB 468 xenograft & transduced 4T1 syngeneic models. Mice were treated with 2 doses of 350 nCi administered at 10 days apart. Tumor growth was monitored by a digital caliper. Results: The pharmacokinetic profile of 89Zr-anti-N4 RIC showed biphasic distribution with a moderate elimination of 63 h. PET imaging & biodistribution of 89Zr anti N4 in mice bearing MDA MB 468 xenograft showed high tumor uptake of 13.2 ± 1.12 %IA/g at 120 h. 225Ac anti N4 was effectively internalized in MDA MB 468 and was cytotoxic to the cells with IC50 of 1.2 kBq/mL. Treatment with 225Ac anti N4 led to complete tumor remission in all mice bearing MDA MB 468 xenografts and 4T1 syngeneic model by day 20 and 28, respectively. Conclusions: 89Zr anti N4 was an effective PET imaging probe with specific uptake in tumor. 225Ac anti N4 was effective as a therapeutic agent resulting in complete remission of tumors in both mouse xenograft & syngeneic models. These results are promising for the development of anti-N4 RICs as theranostics for TNBC. Citation Format: Hanan Babeker, Fabrice Njotu, Jessica Ketchmen, Florence Tikum, Alireza Doroudi, Emmanuel Nwangele, Maruti Uppalapati, Humphrey Fonge. 225Ac/89Zr labeled anti nectin 4 radioimmunoconjugates as theranostics against nectin 4 positive triple negative breast cancer [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2024; Part 1 (Regular Abstracts); 2024 Apr 5-10; San Diego, CA. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2024;84(6_Suppl):Abstract nr 6029.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.009 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".