MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4393087656 · doi:10.58496/bjme/2023/003

Analysis and Design of Steel Silo using STAAD.ProV8i

2023· article· en· W4393087656 on OpenAlexaff
Khalil Ur Rehman, KangLe Wang

Bibliographic record

VenueBabylonian Journal of Mechanical Engineering · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicIndustrial Engineering and Technologies
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Waterloo
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSiloStructural engineeringEngineeringInformation siloCementTonneSection (typography)Mechanical engineeringMaterials scienceComposite materialWaste managementComputer science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Generally silo is a storage structure for heavy bulk materials such as cement coal, wood, food products and saw dust. Its design involves materials, geometry, and structural considerations. This research considered a special structure steel silo treated with myriad conventional and unconventional loading conditions, varied from some tonnes to many of tonnes which findings in uncommon modes of failure. Silo Specifications of 14m height and 3m diameter was designed with section ISMB 300 and ISA 70x70x10mm as per Indian standards. In addition, the plan and section of the silo wad done by the AutoCADD 2018 software. modelling, dynamic analysis and designs were completer in STAAD PRO V8i.Besides, the silo was designed as per Indian standards IS 800.The maximum axial force and shear force of the steel silo were 15.9 KN and 0.037 KN respectively. The aim of this paper was to determined the Plate stress, contour lines, and critical support of the silo, beam end force summary and steel take off of the silo structure. Generally silo is a storage structure for heavy bulk materials such as cement coal, wood, food products and saw dust. Its design involves materials, geometry, and structural considerations. This research considered a special structure steel silo treated with myriad conventional and unconventional loading conditions, varied from some tonnes to many of tonnes which findings in uncommon modes of failure. Silo Specifications of 14m height and 3m diameter was designed with section ISMB 300 and ISA 70x70x10mm as per Indian standards. In addition, the plan and section of the silo wad done by the AutoCADD 2018 software. modelling, dynamic analysis and designs were completer in STAAD PRO V8i.Besides, the silo was designed as per Indian standards IS 800.The maximum axial force and shear force of the steel silo were 15.9 KN and 0.037 KN respectively. The aim of this paper was to determined the Plate stress, contour lines, and critical support of the silo, beam end force summary and steel take off of the silo structure.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.025
Threshold uncertainty score0.085

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0020.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0250.006

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.031
GPT teacher head0.222
Teacher spread0.192 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations11
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueBabylonian Journal of Mechanical EngineeringSame topicIndustrial Engineering and TechnologiesFrench-language works237,207