Solving the single depot open close multiple travelling salesman problem through a multi-chromosome based genetic algorithm
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The multiple travelling salesman problem (MTSP) extends the classical travelling salesman problem (TSP) by involving multiple salesman in the solution. MTSP has found widespread applications in various domains, such as transportation, robotics, and networking. Despite extensive research on MTSP and its variants, there has been limited attention given to the open close multiple travelling salesman problem (OCMTSP) and its variants in the literature. To the best of the author's knowledge, only one study has addressed OCMTSP, introducing an exact algorithm designed for optimal solutions. However, the efficiency of this existing algorithm diminishes for larger instances due to computational complexity. Therefore, there is a crucial need for a high-level metaheuristic to provide optimal/best solutions within a reasonable timeframe. Addressing this gap, this study proposes a first meta-heuristic called multi-chromosome-based Genetic Algorithm (GA) for solving OCMTSP. The effectiveness of the developed algorithm is demonstrated through a comparative study on distinct asymmetric benchmark instances sourced from the TSPLIB dataset. Additionally, results from comprehensive experiments conducted on 90 OCMTSP symmetric instances, generated from the renowned TSPLIB benchmark dataset, highlight the efficiency of the proposed GA in addressing the OCMTSP. Notably, the proposed multi-chromosome-based GA stands out as the top-performing approach in terms of overall performance. Further, solutions to symmetric TSPLIB benchmark instances are also reported, which will be used as a basis for future studies.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".