MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4393089544 · doi:10.5267/j.dsl.2024.1.006

Solving the single depot open close multiple travelling salesman problem through a multi-chromosome based genetic algorithm

2024· article· en· W4393089544 on OpenAlex
M. Veeresh, T. Jayanth Kumar, M. Thangaraj

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

venuePublished in a venue whose home country is Canada.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueDecision Science Letters · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAdvanced Manufacturing and Logistics Optimization
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsTravelling salesman problemGenetic algorithmChromosomeComputer scienceDepot2-optMathematical optimizationAlgorithmMathematicsBiologyGeneticsGeographyGene

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The multiple travelling salesman problem (MTSP) extends the classical travelling salesman problem (TSP) by involving multiple salesman in the solution. MTSP has found widespread applications in various domains, such as transportation, robotics, and networking. Despite extensive research on MTSP and its variants, there has been limited attention given to the open close multiple travelling salesman problem (OCMTSP) and its variants in the literature. To the best of the author's knowledge, only one study has addressed OCMTSP, introducing an exact algorithm designed for optimal solutions. However, the efficiency of this existing algorithm diminishes for larger instances due to computational complexity. Therefore, there is a crucial need for a high-level metaheuristic to provide optimal/best solutions within a reasonable timeframe. Addressing this gap, this study proposes a first meta-heuristic called multi-chromosome-based Genetic Algorithm (GA) for solving OCMTSP. The effectiveness of the developed algorithm is demonstrated through a comparative study on distinct asymmetric benchmark instances sourced from the TSPLIB dataset. Additionally, results from comprehensive experiments conducted on 90 OCMTSP symmetric instances, generated from the renowned TSPLIB benchmark dataset, highlight the efficiency of the proposed GA in addressing the OCMTSP. Notably, the proposed multi-chromosome-based GA stands out as the top-performing approach in terms of overall performance. Further, solutions to symmetric TSPLIB benchmark instances are also reported, which will be used as a basis for future studies.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: Methods
Teacher disagreement score0.447
Threshold uncertainty score0.959

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.035
GPT teacher head0.280
Teacher spread0.245 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it