MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4393090197 · doi:10.1158/1538-7445.am2024-2085

Abstract 2085: Targeting the translation initiation complex component eIF4G1 in melanoma

2024· article· en· W4393090197 on OpenAlexaff
Yongmei Feng, Mariia Radaeva, Hyungsoo Kim, Anagha Deshpande, Ani Deshpande, Predrag Jovanović, Rabi Murad, Ivan Topisirović, Steven H. Olson, Artem Cherkasov, Ze’ev A. Ronai

Bibliographic record

VenueCancer Research · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
Topicmelanin and skin pigmentation
Canadian institutionsJewish General HospitalMcGill UniversityUniversity of British Columbia
Fundersnot available
KeywordsTranslation (biology)Component (thermodynamics)Eukaryotic translationMelanomaMedicineComputational biologyBiologyComputer scienceCancer researchGeneticsMessenger RNAPhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract The translation initiation factor 4F (eIF4F) complex assembly is a rate-limiting step in mRNA translation. eIF4F subunits including eIF4A, eIF4E, and eIF4G, are often upregulated in cancer and neurodegeneration diseases. Elevated eIF4F level/activity has been correlated with poor prognosis and drug resistance. Leveraging our findings with the small molecule SBI-756, which interacts with eIF4G1 and impairs eIF4F complex assembly, we set to map domains that are required for SBI-756 activity. A CRISPR screen using sgRNAs that target different sequences on eIF4G1 led to the identification of the MA3 domain, as a putative binding site for SBI-756. Deletion/mutation of the eIF4G1 MA3 domain attenuated melanoma cells and spheroids growth. Polysome profiling assays confirmed attenuated translation activity, which resembled those seen with SBI-756. In silico virtual screen identified 64 small molecules (out of >10 million) that interact with the MA3 domain. Of these, we have selected four that effectively attenuated melanoma growth in culture. Analogs developed for these four compounds were more potent in impairing the assembly of the eIF4F complex, inhibition of protein translation and the 2D and 3D growth of melanoma cells. RNA-sequencing analysis highlighted altered expression of genes implicated in apoptosis, UPR, cell cycle, and ROS pathways, leading us to test possible combination with pathways that may complement the above. Among those, autophagy inhibitors synergized with our lead compound, M19-6, resulting in efficient melanoma cell death, using notably lower concentrations of these inhibitors. Our findings identify the eIF4G1 MA3 domain as an important player in eIF4F assembly and a potential target for cancer therapy. Citation Format: Yongmei Feng, Mariia Radaeva, Hyungsoo Kim, Anagha Deshpande, Ani Deshpande, Predrag Jovanovic, Rabi Murad, Ivan Topisirovic, Steven Olson, Artem Cherkasov, Ze'ev Ronai. Targeting the translation initiation complex component eIF4G1 in melanoma [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2024; Part 1 (Regular Abstracts); 2024 Apr 5-10; San Diego, CA. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2024;84(6_Suppl):Abstract nr 2085.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.009

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.130
GPT teacher head0.426
Teacher spread0.296 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCancer ResearchSame topicmelanin and skin pigmentationFrench-language works237,207