Kinetics and oxidation of thiocarbohydrazide by hexacyanoferrate(III) in aqueous perchloric acid medium
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Hexacyanoferrate(III) [HCF(III)] was used to oxidize thiocarbohydrazide (TCH) in an aqueous perchloric acid (HClO4) medium, and the reaction kinetics were studied spectrophotometrically at 420 nm while keeping a constant ionic strength of 1.0 mol dm−3 and modulating the temperature between 298K and 318K. The stoichiometry of the reaction among TCH and HCF in the HClO4 medium is 1:2. The reaction has a lower than unit order in both TCH and HClO4 and is of the first order in HCF. The impact of varying the ionic strength and dielectric constant of the medium on the rate has been investigated. The effect of temperature on the reaction rate was studied, and different activation parameters of reaction Ea, ΔH#, ΔS#, ΔG#, and log10 A were calculated. The products of oxidation were analyzed by simple qualitative analysis. On the basis of the collected data, the rate law has been derived, and a probable mechanism has been proposed.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".