MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4393096790 · doi:10.1158/1538-7445.am2024-6027

Abstract 6027: 89Zr-matuzumab and 225Ac-matuzumab as a theranostic for epidermal growth factor receptor-positive KRAS wild-type colorectal and breast cancer xenografts

2024· article· en· W4393096790 on OpenAlexaff
Florence Anjong Tikum, Humphrey Fonge, Fabrice Ngoh Njotu, Hanan Babeker, Jessica K. Pougoue, Nikita Henning, Alireza Doroudi

Bibliographic record

VenueCancer Research · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicColorectal Cancer Treatments and Studies
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Saskatchewan
Fundersnot available
KeywordsKRASColorectal cancerMedicineOncologyInternal medicineBreast cancerEpidermal growth factor receptorCancer researchEpidermal growth factorHuman Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor 2CancerReceptor

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Background: About 80% of colorectal cancer (CRC) and 50 % of Triple-Negative breast cancer (TNBC) patients overexpress epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR). Mutations in the KRAS oncogene (present in 40% of mCRC) lead to constitutive over-activation of EGFR and drive de novo resistance to anti-EGFR drugs. Here, we propose to target KRAS-mutant/BRAF mutant EGFR positive mCRC and TNBC using 225Ac-labeled matuzumab, a humanized anti-EGFR monoclonal antibody. Methods: p- -SCN-macropa was used to conjugate matuzumab for radiolabeling with 225Ac and SCN-deferoxamine was used to conjugate matuzumab for labelling with 89Zr. The radioimmunoconjugates were characterized by flow cytometry, HPLC and iTLC. in vitro cytotoxicity was evaluated in EGFR-positive mCRC, TNBC cell lines and 3D spheroids with different levels of EGFR density. Tumor growth was monitored using digital caliper. Mice were treated with either 10 MBq of 89Zr-matuzumab for imaging or three doses of 13 KBq/dose administered of 225Ac-matuzumab 10 days apart. In vivo study endpoint was tumor volume greater than or equal to 1500 mm3. Results: Flow cytometry showed about 95% binding to the cells in all EGFR-positive colorectal cell lines (DLD-1, SW620, SNU-C2B, HT-29) and breast cancer cell lines (MDA-MB-468, MDA-MB-231). in vitro studies showed enhanced cytotoxicity of 225Ac-matuzumab compared with matuzumab. IC50 in the MDA-MB-468 cell line for 225Ac-matuzumab (1.86 ± nM) was 35 times more effective than matuzumab (65.25± 7 nM). Similar trends were observed in the other KRAS-mutant mCRC cell lines and breast cancer cell lines. In 3D spheroid models, the IC50 of 225Ac-matuzumab (3.0 ± 2 nM) in MDA-MB-468, was 20.79 times more effective than matuzumab (62.3 ± 1.38 nM). Similar trends were observed for all the other spheroid models as well. High uptake of 89Zr-matuzumab was observed in both mCRC and TNBC xenografts. 225Ac-matuzumab slowed tumor growth rate in MDA-MB-468 and MDA-MB-231 tumors models compared with control antibody or non-treated controls for 30 days. This study is still ongoing and will last for 2 more months. Conclusion: 225Ac-matuzumab shows very promising outcomes in KRAS-mutant mCRC models and breast cancer models and warrants further investigation. Citation Format: Florence Anjong Tikum, Humphrey Fonge, Fabrice Njotu, Hanan Babeker, Jessica K. Pougoue, Nikita Henning, Alireza Doroudi. 89Zr-matuzumab and 225Ac-matuzumab as a theranostic for epidermal growth factor receptor-positive KRAS wild-type colorectal and breast cancer xenografts [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2024; Part 1 (Regular Abstracts); 2024 Apr 5-10; San Diego, CA. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2024;84(6_Suppl):Abstract nr 6027.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.005

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.045
GPT teacher head0.396
Teacher spread0.351 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCancer ResearchSame topicColorectal Cancer Treatments and StudiesFrench-language works237,207