MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4393142733 · doi:10.1007/s00410-024-02114-3

Incorporation mechanisms and infrared absorption coefficients of water in MgSiO3 orthoenstatite clarified via comprehensive NMR and vibrational spectroscopic measurements, and first-principles calculations

2024· article· en· W4393142733 on OpenAlexaff
Xianyu Xue, Masami Kanzaki, Abd-Erraouf Djirar, Chris Gregson

Bibliographic record

VenueContributions to Mineralogy and Petrology · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldChemistry
TopicAdvanced NMR Techniques and Applications
Canadian institutionsWestern University
FundersOkayama University
KeywordsInfraredAbsorption (acoustics)GeologyInfrared spectroscopyAnalytical Chemistry (journal)ChemistryPhysicsOpticsOrganic chemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract We performed1H and29Si NMR and infrared measurements, and first-principles calculations to clarify the nature of OH defects in MgSiO3orthoenstatite. An orthoenstatite sample synthesized at 7 GPa and 1200 °C from a composition of MgSiO3 + 0.1 wt% H2O yielded two1H MAS NMR peaks near 5.9 and 7.6 ppm that are correlated in 2D NMR spectra, and two infrared bands near 3361 and 3066 cm− 1that correspond to the previously reported A3 and A4 bands. The first-principles calculations confirmed that they are due to a pair of protons in a Mg (M2) vacancy. The previously reported A1 and A2 infrared bands near 3687 and 3592 cm− 1for orthoenstatite synthesized at low silica activities were confirmed to arise from four protons in a SiB vacancy. The latter is predicted to give two additional OH stretching bands associated with two strongly hydrogen-bonded O3b-H bonds with frequencies below the spectral range reported thus far. The previously reported infrared absorption coefficients were thus revised to account for the undetected bands.1H NMR may be used to quantitatively detect all four protons (expected at 1–12 ppm). Other mantle minerals should also be examined for potentially overlooked OH defects with strong hydrogen bonding.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.004
Threshold uncertainty score0.007

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.020
GPT teacher head0.283
Teacher spread0.262 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations4
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueContributions to Mineralogy and PetrologySame topicAdvanced NMR Techniques and ApplicationsFrench-language works237,207