MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4393148188 · doi:10.21037/jphe-2023-apru-ab011

AB011. Disease burden, and temporal trends in schizophrenia in low- and middle-income countries: a global analysis from 1990 to 2019

2024· article· en· W4393148188 on OpenAlexaff
Fanyu Xue, Qinyao Yu, Sofia Laila Wik, Minjun Gao, Sze Chai Chan, Shui Hang Chow, Claire Chenwen Zhong, Don Eliseo Lucero‐Prisno, Martin C. S. Wong, Junjie Huang

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Public Health and Emergency · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEconomics, Econometrics and Finance
TopicHIV/AIDS Impact and Responses
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Ottawa
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSchizophrenia (object-oriented programming)Burden of diseaseLow and middle income countriesDiseaseDisease burdenDevelopment economicsPsychiatryPsychologyMedicineEnvironmental healthEconomicsDeveloping countryEconomic growthPathology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Background: Schizophrenia is a psychiatric syndrome that presents with delusions, disorganized speech, hallucinations, and impaired executive functioning. This study aims to evaluate the disease burden of schizophrenia in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs), considering genders and 11 age groups, assessing disability adjusted life-years (DALYs) rate, incidence rate, prevalence rate, and temporal trends. Methods: This study utilized data from the Global Burden of Disease (GBD) databases to extract DALYs, incidence rate, and prevalence rate associated with schizophrenia across 173 LMICs or territories from 1990 to 2019. The countries were grouped based on the income classification of the World Bank. Results: The prevalence rates of schizophrenia for both genders in upper-middle income countries (male: 285 to 359; female: 271 to 341) consistently remained higher than the other two income tiers from 1990 to 2019. Prevalence rates showed a mostly positive correlation with time during this period. The prevalence rate of schizophrenia for males was consistently higher than for females in LMICs from 1990 to 2019. While most trends were increasing, the incidence rates of schizophrenia for both genders in upper-income countries decreased significantly from 2009 to 2019 (male: 20.41 to 18.72; female: 18.40 to 16.32). Burn et al. [2013] found that countries with higher income inequality tend to have a higher incidence rate of schizophrenia. The burden of schizophrenia for all measures is positively correlated with the country’s income tier, and male burden is always higher than female burden regardless of the measure method and income tier. Countries in East and Southeast Asia, and Eastern Europe tend to have the highest burden of schizophrenia, while African countries have the lowest burden. Social isolation is highly related to schizophrenia, so creating a more inclusive and equal society may help reduce its burden. Further research is needed to investigate risk factors and treatments for schizophrenia. Conclusions: Schizophrenia is a mental health burden that is prevalent in LMICs in East and Southeast Asia, and East Europe, and is positively correlated with the country’s income tier, with males experiencing a consistently higher burden than females, while income inequality and social isolation are contributing factors, necessitating the need for further investigation and a more inclusive society.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.098
Threshold uncertainty score0.584

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.002
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.038
GPT teacher head0.305
Teacher spread0.268 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Public Health and EmergencySame topicHIV/AIDS Impact and ResponsesFrench-language works237,207