A Monte Carlo-Based Iterative Extended Kalman Filter for Bearings-Only Tracking of Sea Targets
Bibliographic record
Abstract
In this paper, a Monte Carlo (MC)-based extended Kalman filter is proposed for a two-dimensional bearings-only tracking problem (BOT). This problem addresses the processing of noise-corrupted bearing measurements from a sea acoustic source and estimates state vectors including position and velocity. Due to the nonlinearity and complex observability properties in the BOT problem, a wide area of research has been focused on improving its state estimation accuracy. The objective of this research is to present an accurate approach to estimate the relative position and velocity of the source with respect to the maneuvering observer. This approach is implemented using the iterated extended Kalman filter (IEKF) in an MC-based iterative structure (MC-IEKF). Re-linearizing dynamic and measurement equations using the IEKF along with the MC campaign applied to the initial conditions result in significantly improved accuracy in the estimation process. Furthermore, an observability analysis is conducted to show the effectiveness of the designed maneuver of the observer. A comparison with the widely used UKF algorithm is carried out to demonstrate the performance of the proposed method.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".