MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4393150615 · doi:10.1021/acs.accounts.3c00571

Reactive Carbon Capture Enables CO<sub>2</sub> Electrolysis with Liquid Feedstocks

2024· article· en· W4393150615 on OpenAlexaff
Douglas J. D. Pimlott, Yongwook Kim, Curtis P. Berlinguette

Bibliographic record

VenueAccounts of Chemical Research · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnergy
TopicCO2 Reduction Techniques and Catalysts
Canadian institutionsCanadian Institute for Advanced ResearchUniversity of British Columbia
Fundersnot available
KeywordsElectrolysisCarbon fibersFaraday efficiencyElectrolyteElectrochemistryProcess engineeringCarbonateChemistryWaste managementChemical engineeringMaterials scienceElectrodeOrganic chemistryEngineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Conspectus The electrochemical reduction of carbon dioxide (CO2RR) is a promising strategy for mitigating global CO 2 emissions while simultaneously yielding valuable chemicals and fuels, such as CO, HCOO –, and C 2 H 4 . This approach becomes especially appealing when integrated with surplus renewable electricity, as the ensuing production of fuels could facilitate the closure of the carbon cycle. Despite these advantages, the realization of industrial-scale electrolyzers fed with CO 2 will be challenged by the substantial energy inputs required to isolate, pressurize, and purify CO 2 prior to electrolysis. To address these challenges, we devised an electrolyzer capable of directly converting reactive carbon solutions (e.g., a bicarbonate-rich eluent that exits a carbon capture unit) into higher value products. This “reactive carbon electrolyzer” operates by reacting (bi)carbonate with acid generated within the electrolyzer to produce CO 2 in situ, thereby facilitating CO2RR at the cathode. This approach eliminates the need for expensive CO 2 recovery and compression steps, as the electrolyzer can then then coupled directly to the CO 2 capture unit. This Account outlines our endeavors in developing this type of electrolyzer, focusing on the design and implementation of materials for electrocatalytic (bi)carbonate conversion. We highlight the necessity for a permeable cathode that allows the efficient transport of (bi)carbonate ions while maintaining a sufficiently high catalytic surface area. We address the importance of the supporting electrolyte, detailing how (bi)carbonate concentration, counter cations, and ionic impurities impact selectivity for products formed in the electrolyzer. We also catalog state-of-the-art performance metrics for reactive carbon electrolyzers (i.e., Faradaic efficiency, full cell voltage, CO 2 utilization efficiency) and outline strategies to bridge the gap between these values and those required for commercial operation Collectively, these findings contribute to the ongoing efforts to realize industrial-scale electrochemical reactors for CO 2 conversion, bringing us closer to a sustainable and closed-loop carbon cycle.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.029
Threshold uncertainty score0.643

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.017
GPT teacher head0.311
Teacher spread0.294 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations64
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAccounts of Chemical ResearchSame topicCO2 Reduction Techniques and CatalystsFrench-language works237,207