Surgical technique: lung-sparing sleeve bronchoplasty
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract: Total lung-parenchyma-sparing bronchoplasty is a step forward in the treatment of low-grade malignant tumors and benign endobronchial lesions because it allows resection while preserving lung capacity. This technique is feasible in several of the bronchial segments, including the right main bronchus, the intermedius bronchus, and the left main bronchus. Conventionally bronchoplasty has been done using open surgery with a thoracotomy, but lung-parenchyma-sparing bronchoplasty can now be performed minimally invasively by experienced surgeons through a single incision, resulting in less pain, fewer complications, a faster recovery, and equivalent oncological results. Low-grade, localized tumors and benign strictures are the ideal pathologies for lung-sparing bronchoplasty. Keys factors for optimal results include proper patient selection, a thorough oncological and functional evaluation, and meticulous surgical technique to attain negative margins and a complete resection. Reports on uniportal lung-parenchyma-sparing bronchoplasty, although scarce due to the nature and complexity of the procedure, have been published confirming the feasibility and safety of the procedure when performed by well-trained surgeons. Here, we present a lung-parenchyma-sparing sleeve resection and anastomosis using a uniportal approach through a single 3–4 cm incision in the 5th intercostal space to treat a typical carcinoid tumor (a low-grade neuroendocrine tumor) in the left main bronchus.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it