Rethinking Peculiar Images by Diffusion Models: Revealing Local Minima’s Role
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Recent significant advancements in diffusion models have revolutionized image generation, enabling the synthesis of highly realistic images with text-based guidance. These breakthroughs have paved the way for constructing datasets via generative artificial intelligence (AI), offering immense potential for various applications. However, two critical challenges hinder the widespread adoption of synthesized data: computational cost and the generation of peculiar images. While computational costs have improved through various approaches, the issue of peculiar image generation remains relatively unexplored. Existing solutions rely on heuristics, extra training, or AI-based post-processing to mitigate this problem. In this paper, we present a novel approach to address both issues simultaneously. We establish that both gradient descent and diffusion sampling are specific cases of the generalized expectation maximization algorithm. We hypothesize and empirically demonstrate that peculiar image generation is akin to the local minima problem in optimization. Inspired by optimization techniques, we apply naive momentum and positive-negative momentum to diffusion sampling. Last, we propose new metrics to evaluate the peculiarity. Experimental results show momentum effectively prevents peculiar image generation without extra computation.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".