ConsistNER: Towards Instructive NER Demonstrations for LLMs with the Consistency of Ontology and Context
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Named entity recognition (NER) aims to identify and classify specific entities mentioned in textual sentences. Most existing superior NER models employ the standard fully supervised paradigm, which requires a large amount of annotated data during training. In order to maintain performance with insufficient annotation resources (i.e., low resources), in-context learning (ICL) has drawn a lot of attention, due to its plug-and-play nature compared to other methods (e.g., meta-learning and prompt learning). In this manner, how to retrieve high-correlated demonstrations for target sentences serves as the key to emerging ICL ability. For the NER task, the correlation implies the consistency of both ontology (i.e., generalized entity type) and context (i.e., sentence semantic), which is ignored by previous NER demonstration retrieval techniques. To address this issue, we propose ConsistNER, a novel three-stage framework that incorporates ontological and contextual information for low-resource NER. Firstly, ConsistNER employs large language models (LLMs) to pre-recognize potential entities in a zero-shot manner. Secondly, ConsistNER retrieves the sentence-specific demonstrations for each target sentence based on the two following considerations: (1) Regarding ontological consistency, demonstrations are filtered into a candidate set based on ontology distribution. (2) Regarding contextual consistency, an entity-aware self-attention mechanism is introduced to focus more on the potential entities and semantic-correlated tokens. Finally, ConsistNER feeds the retrieved demonstrations for all target sentences into LLMs for prediction. We conduct experiments on four widely-adopted NER datasets, including both general and specific domains. Experimental results show that ConsistNER achieves a 6.01%-26.37% and 3.07%-21.18% improvement over the state-of-the-art baselines on Micro-F1 scores under 1- and 5-shot settings, respectively.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.007 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.005 |
| Open science | 0.003 | 0.004 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.007 | 0.005 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".