Application of graph neural networks to forecast urban flood events: the case study of the 2013 flood of the Bow River, Calgary, Canada
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Mitigating the harmful effects of flooding is essential in the current climate change and urban growth scenario, where these natural phenomena are expected to occur more often. Addressing this problem, we present a novel graph-based forecasting model for predicting urban flooding and showcase its application in the Bow River in the City of Calgary, Alberta, Canada. The proposed model is based on graph theory and deep learning paradigms and was used to forecast flooding occurrences up to 24 h ahead. Our new approach developed the SAGE algorithm, a hybrid learning and planning approach that accurately predicted floodings for various analyzed forecasting horizons, increasing the forecasting performance by up to 44% compared to the persistence model. The SAGE model also returned superior or competitive results compared to other models in the literature. The superiority of the SAGE model was highlighted for longer forecast horizons of 24 h ahead, where it reached a maximum improvement of 79%, suggesting its superiority in capturing spatiotemporal information in the dataset. These results indicate that the SAGE approach is a cutting-edge tool for flooding forecasting, and it could be used to develop early flood warning systems to reduce potential flooding impacts.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".