MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4393166607 · doi:10.1016/j.jbc.2024.106983

Abstract 1837 ID please! Determining protein interactors of an uncharacterised yeast lipase using BioID

2024· article· en· W4393166607 on OpenAlexaffabout
Ariz Lalani, Andrew H. Henderson, Maya Schuldiner, Vanina Zaremberg

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Biological Chemistry · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicBiotin and Related Studies
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Calgary
Fundersnot available
KeywordsYeastLipaseBiologyComputational biologyBiochemistryChemistryEnzyme

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Drl1 is a putative lipase in Saccharomyces cerevisiae for which the exact role in the lipid metabolic pathways is still unknown. A previous genome-wide screening from our lab showed that Drl1 is involved in the regulation of diacylglycerol (DAG) localization, as normal DAG pools were disrupted in Drl1 knockout and catalytically dead strains. We aim to determine the role of Drl1 in lipid metabolism by studying its protein-protein interactions using TurboID, a more recent iteration of the BioID biotin proximity labelling technology, combined with an auxin-induced degron-fused Bpl1 to reduce endogenous biotinylation signal (https://doi.org/10.15252/msb.202211084). Streptavidin-HRP blots have shown that overnight incubation in auxin-enriched media greatly reduces signal from abundant endogenously biotinylated proteins, including Acc1, Hfa1 and Arc1. Furthermore, four-hour pulses of biotin combined with continued auxin incubation resulted in the appearance of additional bands on Streptavidin-HRP blots compared to controls, providing strong evidence that interactors of Drl1 are being biotinylated above background levels and would make promising candidates for Streptavidin-Sepharose affinity purification, with the end goal of sending enriched samples for proteomic analysis to identify likely interactors of Drl1. Different washes and elution conditions varying pH and denaturing agents, are currently being tested using Streptavidin-coated magnetic beads to determine optimum enrichment conditions for MS-MS analysis. This work has been financially supported by the Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada (NSERC) grant to VZ.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.497

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.025
GPT teacher head0.284
Teacher spread0.259 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Biological ChemistrySame topicBiotin and Related StudiesFrench-language works237,207