MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4393166845 · doi:10.1016/j.jbc.2024.107068

Abstract 2235 Identifying the CowN-MoFeP Interaction Site Utilizing Protein Cross-linking

2024· article· en· W4393166845 on OpenAlexafffund
Katie Sanders, Cedric P. Owens

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Biological Chemistry · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicTissue Engineering and Regenerative Medicine
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Calgary
FundersCanadian Institutes of Health ResearchChapman UniversityNational Institutes of HealthMichael Smith Health Research BCNational Science Foundation
KeywordsProtein–protein interactionChemistryComputational biologyBiophysicsBiologyBiochemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Nitrogenase is a bacterial enzyme that catalyzes the conversion of nitrogen gas into ammonia, a key plant nutrient. Nitrogenase is a protein complex consisting of a homodimeric reductase (Fe-protein) and a catalytic subunit (MoFeP), which is a dimer of dimers. Carbon monoxide (CO) inhibits nitrogenase by acting as a mixed inhibitor. To protect nitrogenase from CO, many nitrogen fixing organisms express a small protein, CowN, which interacts with MoFeP to weaken carbon monoxide inhibition. The goal of this research was to determine the interaction site between Gluconacetobacter diazotrophicus CowN and MoFeP. To do so, a cross-linking approach was utilized. A series of cross-linkers were tested to capture the MoFeP-CowN interaction, including EDC, BS3 and SIAB. The lysine-cysteine reactive cross-linker SIAB formed a cross-linked complex between CowN and MoFeP, suggesting that the cross-linking interface contains a lysine and a cysteine residue. Next, a variant of CowN, C90A-CowN, was created that eliminated all cysteine reactivity on CowN. SIAB cross-linking still occurred with C90A-CowN, indicating that the SIAB cross linker most likely reacts with a lysine on CowN and a cysteine on MoFeP. Further analysis of the cross-linked complex by mass spectrometry demonstrated that CowN interacted with both subunits of MoFeP. The sequence coverage for the complex was very high, however, no characteristic peptides indicative of a CowN-MoFeP complex were found. Further experiments using different mass spectrometry approaches and MoFeP mutants are currently underway to determine the CowN-MoFeP interaction site. I would like to thank the past nitrogenase team, especially Joshuah Arellano, Dr. Owens, Chapman University, for making the nitrogenase project progress so much. I would also like to give a big thank you to the NSF for funding the research at Chapman University in Schmid College of Science and Technology.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.005

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.062
GPT teacher head0.357
Teacher spread0.295 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Biological ChemistrySame topicTissue Engineering and Regenerative MedicineFrench-language works237,207